is substantial

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is substantial" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is significant or considerable in amount, degree, or importance. Example: "The evidence presented in the report is substantial enough to warrant further investigation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"An anorak is substantial.

The New Yorker

Yet the gain is substantial.

The New Yorker

But the number is substantial.

The Economist

The lineup is substantial.

The New York Times

Still, the damage elsewhere is substantial.

The New York Times - Arts

So the show's program is substantial.

The New York Times - Arts

"The regulatory void here is substantial".

The New York Times - Tech

What kind of obstacle is "substantial"?

The New York Times

What we need is substantial tax reform".

The New York Times

Here is substantial money for AIDS.

The Economist

The potential for confusion is substantial.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is substantial", ensure that the context clearly indicates what aspect is significant (e.g., amount, impact, or quality) to avoid ambiguity. Providing specific details or comparisons can enhance clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "is substantial" as a generic filler. Always ensure it quantifies or qualifies something specific and measurable to maintain clarity and impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is substantial" functions as a linking verb plus an adjective, describing a noun's quality or state of being. Ludwig examples show it attributing significant size, impact, or importance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

3%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is substantial" is a versatile and frequently used expression to denote significance, size, or impact. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and appropriate for various contexts, predominantly in news, media, and scientific writing. When choosing alternatives, consider nuances in meaning; ""is considerable"" and ""is significant"" are closely related, while others like "carries weight" shift the emphasis. For effective writing, use "is substantial" to quantify or qualify specific aspects, enhancing clarity and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is considerable

Emphasizes the size or amount of something.

is significant

Highlights the importance or consequence of something.

is sizable

Focuses on the physical dimensions or extent.

is noteworthy

Indicates something deserving attention or recognition.

is appreciable

Suggests that something is easily perceived or noticed.

is marked

Implies a noticeable or distinct characteristic.

is considerable in magnitude

Emphasizes the greatness of size or extent.

is of consequence

Indicates the importance or significance of something.

is of great import

Emphasizes the high importance of the subject.

carries weight

Focuses on how compelling or convincing something is.

FAQs

How can I use "is substantial" in a sentence?

Use "is substantial" to describe something that is large in amount, size, or degree. For example, "The investment in renewable energy is substantial."

What can I say instead of "is substantial"?

You can use alternatives like "is considerable", "is significant", or "is appreciable" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is substantial" or "is substantive"?

"Is substantial" generally refers to size or amount, while "is substantive" refers to content or essence. Choose the term that best fits the meaning you intend.

How does the formality of "is substantial" compare to other alternatives?

"Is substantial" is generally neutral to formal. For more formal contexts, consider "is significant". For less formal contexts, "is considerable" or "is sizable" may be appropriate.