is subject to human error

USAGE SUMMARY

The sentence is correct and can be used in written English.
Example: "This manual process is subject to human error, so it should be double-checked for accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

First, identifying damage by hand/eye is subject to human error and dependent upon the subjective opinion of the classifier.

Brain

In the end of the day, it is subject to human error".

The New York Times

"Yes, it is subject to human error, just like anything else is.

The New York Times - Sports

Secondly, the study is based on quantitative content analysis which is subject to human error.

International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility

In a statement, he said classifying crimes is "a complex process that is subject to human error".

Los Angeles Times

He also noted that the FBI database isn't necessarily complete and is subject to human error, since a lot of the data is manually handled.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

It's also work that – without the proper tools in place – is subject to human errors and/or non-standardization.

Forbes

The manual scoring is subject to human errors and it is time consuming, costly process, and not sufficient enough for reliable information [3, 4].

Brain Informatics

In this case, the time consuming is increased significantly and the calibration may be subject to human error.

Measurement

The rail executive also noted that the passenger numbers counted on a single day at one station may not be representative of overcrowding on those services over a greater period of time, and may be subject to human error.

The Guardian

David Wang, Huawei's executive director for research and development spending, said the hardware and software were "very complicated systems" that were subject to human error, but that there were "no maliciously planted back doors" in its systems.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When trying to reduce potential for human errors, consider if the task can be automated, use tools like checklists, and consider error proofing with poka-yoke methods.

Common error

Avoid using "is subject to human error" as an excuse for accepting mistakes. Instead, use it as a reason to implement strategies for minimizing errors and improving overall reliability. Do not overstate how frequent human errors occur in the context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is subject to human error" functions as a descriptive statement, identifying the potential for mistakes due to human involvement in a particular process or system. This indicates a liability or vulnerability, as supported by examples found by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

16%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is subject to human error" is grammatically sound and used to acknowledge the potential for mistakes when humans are involved in a task or process. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and utility. It is particularly relevant in professional and scientific contexts, where accuracy and reliability are paramount. While relatively uncommon, as only a handful of examples were found, the phrase's purpose is to manage expectations and justify the need for error-prevention strategies. Related phrases include "is prone to mistakes" and "is vulnerable to human mistakes", offering alternative ways to express similar ideas. It's crucial to use this phrase not as an excuse for errors, but as a driver for implementing better safeguards. Finally, remember to avoid stating errors when that is not the case in the specific content context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is vulnerable to human mistakes

Emphasizes the susceptibility to errors specifically caused by human actions, adding detail.

has the potential for human errors

Highlights the possibility of human errors occurring, emphasizing potential rather than certainty.

is prone to mistakes

Focuses on the likelihood of errors without explicitly mentioning the human element.

is not immune to human error

Indicates the absence of protection against human error, adding a layer of negation.

is susceptible to errors

Highlights vulnerability to errors, omitting the direct cause being human fallibility.

can be affected by human mistakes

Indicates the possibility of being influenced by human errors, softening the statement.

carries a risk of human errors

Focuses on the inherent risk of errors due to human involvement, shifting the perspective.

is liable to err

States a tendency to make mistakes, using a more formal and direct tone.

is fallible

Implies the capability of making mistakes, directly addressing the inherent human trait.

is imperfect

Highlights a general lack of perfection, indirectly suggesting the possibility of errors.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is subject to human error"?

Alternatives include "is prone to mistakes", "is vulnerable to human mistakes", or "has the potential for human errors", each offering slightly different nuances.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "is subject to human error"?

It is appropriate when discussing processes, systems, or tasks where human involvement introduces the possibility of mistakes. This is especially relevant in fields like healthcare, manufacturing, and data analysis.

What are some strategies to mitigate situations that "is subject to human error"?

Strategies include implementing checklists, automating tasks, providing adequate training, and using error-proofing techniques. The goal is to minimize the likelihood and impact of human errors.

What is the difference between "is subject to human error" and "is caused by human error"?

"Is subject to human error" indicates a potential for errors due to human involvement, while "is caused by human error" implies that an error has already occurred as a direct result of human action.