Exact(7)
That is, studies with negative findings are less likely to be written up and published.
The same tendency, which may be the effect of long branch attraction [44], has been observed earlier is studies with a limited taxon sampling [41] [43].
In this communication, we present all studies that reported outcomes for differentially FGM/C exposed groups of women, that is, studies with a comparison group.
We also observed moderate reductions in triglycerides with higher-protein diets although this effect was smaller when studies at lower risk of bias were analysed separately (that is, studies with <20% loss to follow-up).
However, with 34.8% of variance accounted for, the total score of the scale used to assess the methodological quality of the studies exhibited a positive, statistically significant relationship with the prevalence rates, that is, studies with a better methodology tended to show higher lifetime prevalence rates than studies that were methodologically poor (Table 3).
As a result, we have given preference to publications with large sample sizes where a pool of GIST patients with a mix of those variables can occur, that is, studies with heterogeneous patient populations (i.e., different treatment histories, stages of GIST) and response criteria.
Similar(53)
Finally a one-dimensional case is studied with some simplifications.
Vocal quality is studied with more details in [8].
LER is studied with a fast quasi-static dissolution algorithm.
Morphology of the nFRC is studied with SEM.
Thermal stability to high temperature is studied with different tests.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com