Exact(1)
However, such material is limited in quantities and it is very difficult to obtain homogeneous material that is standardised from one preparation to the next or from different individuals.
Similar(59)
All scales are standardised from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better QoL.
The score of each subscale was standardised from 0 to 10.
Subscale raw scores are standardised from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Raw scores for each subscale were standardised from 0 to 100 [ 35] and survivors who scored in the top 16% of each distribution were classified as a 'case' on that specific coping strategy [ 36].
Raw subscale scores were standardised from 0 to 100 and survivors who scored in the bottom one-third of each distribution were classified as having 'low' availability of that particular type of social support (Sherbourne, personal communication).
To make data interpretation easier, scores were standardised from 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL) following this formula: P 100 = [100/(p max-pmin)]* preal - pmin) With the standardised scores, the mean (SD) was 39.4 (20.5) points.
Both have been standardised for the Dutch population from 4 to 18 years old, and rate 120 problem behaviour items on a three-point scale (0 = not true, 1 = somewhat true or sometimes true, 2 = very true or often true) [ 28, 29].
Finally, for offspring production, we also observed an interaction between the reaction norms, especially when data from each population were standardised for the same overall mean (Fig. 6).
Procedurally, although the practice of fixation of tumour specimens is standardised, the observation that samples processed from one anatomical pathology laboratory (AP7) had a significantly higher rate of sequencing artefacts and fragmentation indicates that fixation processes may not actually be uniform between different laboratories.
This allows terms from different sources to be standardised for easy aggregation and comparison.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com