is safe to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is safe to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the safety of an action, object, or situation. Example: "It is safe to say that wearing a seatbelt while driving is essential for passenger safety."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It is safe to come here".

Independent

Gulf seafood is safe to eat.

The New York Times

What, if anything, is safe to eat?

The New York Times

Verdict: it is safe to cut rates.

The Economist

It is safe to eat everywhere.

The New York Times

How much alcohol is safe to drink?

The Guardian

No woman is safe, to me.

The New Yorker

Not very, it is safe to say.

The New York Times

It's why our food is safe to eat, our water is safe to drink, and our air is safe to breathe.

The Guardian

It is safe to say Holt and Lambert were not.

Independent

(Properly filtered water is safe to drink across India).

The New York Times - Travel

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is safe to", ensure the context clearly defines what or who is being protected from harm. For example, "This medication is safe to use for children over 12" provides explicit information.

Common error

Avoid using "is safe to" without specifying what the subject is safe for. For instance, instead of saying "It is safe to use", specify "It is safe to use on delicate fabrics."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is safe to" functions as an adjective phrase followed by an infinitive, indicating that something presents a low risk of harm or danger. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

30%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is safe to" is a versatile and frequently used construction to indicate a low risk of harm or danger associated with an action, object, or situation. Grammatically correct and widely accepted, as Ludwig AI confirms, it finds prominence across various domains, particularly in news, wiki entries, and scientific literature. When employing this phrase, clarity is paramount: explicitly define the subject and the context in which it is deemed safe. While alternatives like "is permissible to" or "poses no risk to" exist, the core function remains consistent: assuring an audience of relative security. This makes "is safe to" an effective tool for instilling confidence and promoting informed decisions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is harmless to

Focuses specifically on the absence of harm.

is permissible to

Replaces "safe" with "permissible", focusing on whether something is allowed rather than its inherent risk.

is okay to

Uses a more informal term "okay" instead of "safe", suggesting a lower level of concern.

is alright to

Similar to "is okay to" but slightly less common.

poses no risk to

Shifts the focus to the absence of risk rather than the presence of safety.

does not endanger

Emphasizes the lack of danger or harm.

is without peril to

A more formal and literary way of expressing safety.

presents minimal danger to

Suggests that while there might be some danger, it is very small.

can be done without risk to

Rephrases the sentence to emphasize the action and the lack of risk.

is unlikely to harm

Uses a probabilistic term, suggesting a low probability of harm.

FAQs

How can I use "is safe to" in a sentence?

You can use "is safe to" to indicate that an action, object, or situation does not pose a significant risk of harm. For example, "It is safe to eat cooked seafood" or "It is safe to walk here during the day".

What phrases are similar to "is safe to"?

Alternatives include "is harmless to", "poses no risk to", or "is permissible to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct: "is safe to do" or "is safe for doing"?

"Is safe to do" is the more grammatically sound choice because it uses the infinitive form of the verb. "Is safe for doing" is less common and can sound awkward.

Is there a difference between "is safe to use" and "is safe for use"?

While both are generally acceptable, "is safe to use" focuses on the action of using something, whereas "is safe for use" focuses on the purpose or suitability for a particular application. The choice depends on the context.