Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
In a standard GWAS (of genotyped SNPs only), the presence of a number of SNPs in the same region showing the same signal is generally considered an indication that the signal is reliable; however, the same can clearly not be said for an imputation-based GWAS.
Similar(59)
The emulsification process was reliable, however, over only a narrow range of air addition rates.
These methods are reliable; however, due to the consideration of nonlinear behavior of the parameters, they involve many complexities such as the phenomenon of limit cycle for the piston [15, 16].
Thus, hazard ratios are likely to be reliable; however absolute risk is likely to be underestimated because of the probability of under-reporting by the GPs.
The PedsQL™ Family Impact module was reliable, however it displayed large ceiling effects and did not discriminate well between parents of children with and without sickle cell disease.
In order for the estimates to be reliable, however, it is absolutely critical that the crossvalidation be external to the entire process by which the classifier is created (Simon et al, 2003).
For discrimination, both scoring methods seemed to be reliable, however, the SDC for the mSASSS was slightly smaller compared to the RASSS (2.9 vs. 3.5), suggesting that the measurement error with the RASSS is somewhat higher.
However, Trinity is reliable in assembling genes from different chromosomes and avoiding chimeras, especially when the hybrid has been derived from different species [ 26].
A traditional distribution transformer is very reliable; however, it is bulky and cumbersome.
When the difference between true and observed variance is small, metrics may be considered reliable; however, there are times when the true variability accounts for only a minority of the observed variability, 12 and metrics are highly unreliable.
Within a contig, if the clone orders are correct but the clone overlaps are unreliable, the contig is deemed reliable, however, gaps may remain at the sequence level.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com