is relevance for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is relevance for" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a misconstruction and should be rephrased for clarity. Example: "The study is of relevance for understanding climate change impacts."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Information Processing & Management

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The study asked: What is relevance for the group studied, and how does relevance evolve over the course of the students' 4-month history project?

Information Processing & Management

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Relevance Which evidence is relevant for this?

Asia-Pacific Science Education

"The big, burning question is what is the relevance for human disease".

The Guardian

Complement is an essential component of the immune system and is of relevance for the destruction of invading microorganisms.

Plosone

Treatment regimens were observed to be of relevance for ICU LOS.

Critical Care

For instance, respectful meetings have been reported to be of relevance for returning to work [ 9].

BMC Public Health

There is no relevance for a music programme.

Independent

This is of relevance for the Portevin-Le Chaˆtelier effect.

Acta Materialia

Not every topic is of relevance for each region.

Energy, Sustainability and Society

The stabilization of these interfaces is of relevance for the formulation of foams, emulsions and dispersions.

Polymer

This work is of relevance for similar projects such as INSPIRE.

Applied Ergonomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "is relevance for" in formal writing. Opt for grammatically correct alternatives like "is relevant to" or "is of relevance to".

Common error

The correct preposition to use with "relevance" is "to", not "for". Using "for" creates a grammatically incorrect phrase. Always double-check preposition usage to ensure clarity and correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is relevance for" is intended to express the importance or applicability of something. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is grammatically incorrect. The intended function is to indicate a relationship of pertinence or consequence.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Information Processing & Management

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

3%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is relevance for" is an ungrammatical construction. Ludwig AI analysis indicates that the proper phrasing should be "is relevant to" or "is of relevance to". While some instances of the phrase appear in various sources, particularly in scientific and news contexts, they are likely due to errors or non-native English usage. Therefore, it is best to avoid "is relevance for" in favor of grammatically correct alternatives to ensure clarity and credibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is relevant to

This is a grammatically correct and widely accepted alternative, directly addressing the relevance of a subject.

is of relevance to

This option uses a more formal tone, emphasizing the importance or applicability of something.

is important for

This alternative focuses on the importance of something in achieving a specific outcome.

matters for

This is a more direct and informal way to indicate that something has significance.

is significant for

This emphasizes the notable impact or consequence of something.

is applicable to

This phrase highlights that something can be applied or used in a certain situation.

is pertinent to

A more formal way to say that something is directly related and important to a particular subject.

has bearing on

This indicates that something has an influence or effect on a particular situation.

is consequential for

This emphasizes the resulting impact or effect on a subject.

is key for

This highlights the crucial or essential nature of something.

FAQs

What is the correct way to express relevance?

The correct way to express relevance is to use the phrase "is relevant to". For example, "This information "is relevant to" your research".

What are some alternatives to saying "is relevance for"?

Instead of "is relevance for", you can say ""is relevant to"", "is of relevance to", or "is important for" depending on the specific context.

Why is "is relevance for" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "is relevance for" is grammatically incorrect because the correct preposition to use with "relevance" is "to". Therefore, the correct phrase is "is relevant to".

In what contexts might I mistakenly use "is relevance for"?

You might mistakenly use "is relevance for" if you are not a native English speaker or if you are quickly translating from another language where a similar phrase structure is correct. Always proofread your writing to ensure proper preposition usage.