Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is proprietary for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "is proprietary for" is not commonly used in written English and may sound awkward.
It can be used when discussing ownership or exclusive rights related to a product, service, or information. Example: "The software is proprietary for our company, meaning it cannot be used or distributed without permission."
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
While the client's GUI is open-source, the client itself is proprietary for security and scientific integrity reasons.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
Some of these B2B services are proprietary; for example, Wal-Mart tells its suppliers that they must use its own system if they want to be part of its annual turnover of $250 billion.So e-commerce is already very big, and it is going to get much bigger.
News & Media
Generally, concepts of secondary qualities are taken to be proprietary for each sensory modality.
Science
Unfortunately, this parameter was proprietary for stationary phase no.
The stimulation parameters in terms of pulse duration and frequency are proprietary for the manufacturer and thus are not included in this protocol.
"We reserve the right to protect that which we feel is proprietary," a spokesman for Diebold, David Bear, said.
News & Media
Its IOS program is proprietary, making it costly for customers to defect to other suppliers.But that is where the parallels end.
News & Media
What I look for is proprietary data.
News & Media
There is proprietary education, which works for some people.
News & Media
Some of these degree-granting schools you may have heard of without knowing that they are "proprietary," or for-profit, for instance, New York City's School of Visual Arts, which has approximately 4,000 undergraduate and graduate students.
News & Media
It could also be proprietary technology for self-driving cars although, given the size of that industry, it's unlikely that such development would be controlled by a single service provider and might in fact have the opposite effect: it becomes even easier to enter the car on demand market.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "is proprietary for", ensure the context clearly indicates who owns or has exclusive rights to the subject. It's most appropriate when discussing intellectual property, technology, or business practices.
Common error
Avoid using "is proprietary for" in situations where simple ownership or intended use is sufficient. Opt for clearer and more common alternatives like "is owned by" or "is intended for" in general communication.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is proprietary for" functions as a linking verb construction indicating that something is exclusively owned or controlled by a specific entity. Ludwig's examples show that this construction is often used to describe technologies, data, or processes.
Frequent in
Science
30%
News & Media
30%
Formal & Business
20%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
10%
Wiki
5%
Reference
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "is proprietary for" signifies exclusive ownership or control, typically in professional and technical contexts. While grammatically acceptable, Ludwig suggests it is less common than alternatives like "is proprietary to" or "is exclusively for". It is used to assert intellectual property rights or competitive advantage, especially in discussions about technology, business practices, and data. When using "is proprietary for", ensure clarity about who holds the exclusive rights.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is exclusively for
Focuses on the exclusivity aspect, highlighting that something is only intended for a specific entity or purpose.
is the property of
Emphasizes ownership, indicating that something legally belongs to a particular owner.
is privately owned by
Highlights private ownership, suggesting that something is not publicly available.
is intended for
Shifts the focus to the intended purpose, indicating that something is designed or meant for a specific use.
is reserved for
Implies that something is set aside or designated for a particular entity or purpose.
is restricted to
Focuses on limitations, suggesting that access or use is limited to a specific group or purpose.
is the sole right of
Stresses the unique entitlement to something, indicating that only one party has the right to it.
is custom-made for
Highlights that something is specifically designed and created for a particular entity or purpose.
is uniquely designed for
Emphasizes the unique design aspect, suggesting that something is specially tailored for a specific application.
is tailor-made for
Similar to "is custom-made for", but emphasizes a closer fit or adaptation to specific needs.
FAQs
What does "is proprietary for" mean?
The phrase "is proprietary for" indicates that something is owned and controlled exclusively by a particular entity, meaning it's not publicly available or usable without permission.
When is it appropriate to use "is proprietary for" in a sentence?
Use "is proprietary for" when emphasizing that something is protected intellectual property or a trade secret. For instance, "This technology is proprietary for our company."
What are some alternatives to "is proprietary for"?
Consider using alternatives like "is exclusively for", "is owned by", or "is intended for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is "is proprietary to" more common than "is proprietary for"?
Yes, "is proprietary to" is a more common and grammatically standard construction. While "is proprietary for" isn't incorrect, it's less frequently used and might sound less natural.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
3.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested