is previously acknowledged

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is previously acknowledged" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "has been previously acknowledged" to indicate that something was acknowledged at an earlier time. Example: "The importance of this issue has been previously acknowledged in our discussions."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Poverty in America is much more widespread than has been previously acknowledged.

The New York Times

There are many exceptions to this, and land management decisions are more differentiated within the socio-cultural, multipurpose landscape than has perhaps been previously acknowledged.

Land Use Policy

The documents suggest that Mr. Liu held Mr. Pan in high regard as a fund-raiser, perhaps more so than has been previously acknowledged.

The New York Times

Our findings demonstrate the existence of people with exceptionally good face recognition ability and show that the range of face recognition and face perception ability is wider than has been previously acknowledged.

Harvard University

With his silence, Mr. Brown has appeared eager to draw a veil over negotiations with Libya in the past five years in which, it was previously acknowledged, oil deals and Mr. Megrahi's release were central to the agenda.

The New York Times

George Clooney has cemented his status as a Hollywood leading man, with three best actor nominations in four years (he was previously acknowledged for "Michael Clayton" and "Up in the Air") and a best supporting actor win in 2005, for "Syriana".

The New York Times

Last month a Foreign Office official was photographed carrying documents, marked "sensitive", which suggested British authorities now hold more information about flights into and out of Diego Garcia at the time than was previously acknowledged, and that these logs had been given to police.

The Guardian

French nuclear tests in the South Pacific in the 1960s and 1970s were far more toxic than has been previously acknowledged and hit a vast swath of Polynesia with radioactive fallout, according to newly declassified ministry of defence documents which have angered veterans and civilians' groups.

The Guardian

"The letter filed today on Mr. Donaghy's behalf contains an assortment of lies, unfounded allegations and facts that have been previously acknowledged, such as the fact that certain N.B.A. referees engaged in casino gambling in violation of N.B.A. rules," Joel Litvin, the N.B.A. president for league and basketball operations, said in a statement.

The New York Times - Sports

BOGOTÁ, Colombia — The United States played a more elaborate role in the events leading up to this month's rescue operation of 15 hostages in the Colombian jungle than had been previously acknowledged, including the deployment of more than 900 American military personnel members to Colombia earlier this year in efforts to locate the hostages, according to an official briefed on these efforts.

The New York Times

The Americanist movement, in particular, may have had a darker side than has been previously acknowledged.

Johns Hopkins University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Opt for stronger, more direct verbs like "recognized", "established", or "identified" depending on the specific context.

Common error

Avoid using the present tense "is" with "previously acknowledged". Instead, use the past perfect "has been" or simple past "was" to correctly indicate that the acknowledgement occurred in the past.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is previously acknowledged" functions as a passive construction aiming to indicate something that has been recognized before. However, as identified by Ludwig AI, it contains grammatical errors and it is not the standard way to formulate this concept.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is previously acknowledged" is grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "has been previously acknowledged" or "was previously acknowledged". Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is non-standard. Consequently, it's essential to use the correct tense to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. While the intended purpose is to indicate something recognized before, the incorrect structure undermines this. Considering the lack of examples and the grammatical error, it is crucial to avoid this phrasing in formal or academic writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

has been previously recognized

Replaces "acknowledged" with "recognized", maintaining a similar meaning but with a different verb.

was formerly acknowledged

Replaces "previously" with "formerly", indicating a past acknowledgement that might not be current.

was previously known

Focuses on prior knowledge rather than acknowledgement, altering the emphasis slightly.

had been acknowledged before

Rearranges the words for a slightly different emphasis on the timing of the acknowledgement.

has been previously established

Suggests a formal confirmation or validation, adding a layer of authority to the prior knowledge.

was acknowledged in the past

Specifies the acknowledgement occurred at some undefined point in the past.

had been previously noted

Emphasizes the act of noticing or recording something in the past.

was previously identified

Highlights the act of distinguishing or recognizing something specific in the past.

is already known

Simplifies the phrase to emphasize current knowledge, omitting the 'previously' component.

is a known fact

States the information as a general truth.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "is previously acknowledged"?

The correct phrasing is either "has been previously acknowledged" or "was previously acknowledged", depending on the context and tense required.

What does "has been previously acknowledged" mean?

It means that something was recognized or admitted as true or valid at an earlier point in time.

Are there alternatives to "has been previously acknowledged"?

Yes, you can use alternatives like "has been previously recognized", "was previously known", or "has been previously established" depending on the intended nuance.

When should I use "has been previously acknowledged" versus "was previously acknowledged"?

"Has been previously acknowledged" is used when the acknowledgement has relevance to the present. "Was previously acknowledged" is used when the acknowledgement occurred in the past and may not have current relevance.