is pieces of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is pieces of" is not correct in standard written English.
It should be "are pieces of" to agree with the plural subject "pieces." Example: "The puzzle is made up of pieces of various shapes and colors."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

A Baby monitor is pieces of apparatus.

Harvard University

Dust is pieces of hair and skin.

The New York Times - Magazine

Indeed, open as TED is, pieces of its ecosystem are highly managed.

Harvard Business Review

It is pieces of this memory palace that form the basis of the exhibition.

The Guardian - Arts

"Our metaphor is pieces of paper, but they can contain anything," he said.

The New York Times - Tech

To maximize the total scale value of subjective preference at each seat, various is pieces of acoustical equipment were designed.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

There were pieces of flesh.

Independent

There were pieces of human flesh everywhere".

Independent

Inside were pieces of colored chalk.

The New Yorker

But road names are pieces of history.

The Washington Post

These, too, are pieces of paper.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the composition of something, consider using more precise language, such as "consists of", "comprises", or "is made up of".

Common error

A frequent error is using "is" with plural nouns like "pieces". To avoid this, remember that plural subjects require plural verbs. Therefore, use "are pieces of" instead of "is pieces of".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is pieces of" functions as a copular verb construction, attempting to link a subject with its component parts. However, it's grammatically flawed, as confirmed by Ludwig, due to subject-verb disagreement with plural "pieces."

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Science

20%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is pieces of" is grammatically incorrect due to the mismatch between the singular verb "is" and the plural noun "pieces". While Ludwig provides some examples of its usage across various sources, this does not validate its correctness. It should be replaced with "are pieces of" or alternative phrases like "consists of pieces of" or "comprises pieces of" to ensure grammatical accuracy. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is not considered standard English and should be avoided in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

consists of pieces of

Replaces "is" with "consists of" to correct the grammatical error while retaining the meaning.

comprises pieces of

Similar to "consists of", "comprises" is a more formal alternative that corrects the grammar.

is made up of pieces of

Emphasizes the composition or construction from multiple pieces.

includes pieces of

Suggests that something contains several pieces, but may also contain other elements.

incorporates pieces of

Implies that pieces have been integrated into a larger whole.

features pieces of

Highlights the inclusion of several pieces as a notable aspect.

contains fragments of

Uses "fragments" as a synonym for "pieces", implying smaller or incomplete parts.

is formed from pieces of

Focuses on the process of creation or assembly from various pieces.

is assembled from pieces of

Specifically suggests that something has been constructed from several pieces.

is partly composed of pieces of

Emphasizes that pieces are only part of the whole, implying there are other components involved.

FAQs

What's the proper way to say something is composed of multiple parts?

Instead of the grammatically incorrect "is pieces of", use "are pieces of". Better alternatives include "consists of pieces of" or "comprises pieces of".

Is "is pieces of" ever correct?

No, "is pieces of" is not grammatically correct in standard English. Always use "are pieces of" when referring to multiple pieces.

What are some alternatives to "is pieces of" that sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, use "comprises pieces of" or "is composed of pieces of" instead of "are pieces of".

How can I correct the phrase "is pieces of" in my writing?

Replace "is pieces of" with "are pieces of". Alternatively, rephrase the sentence using constructions like "consists of" or "is made up of".