is order for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is order for" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "in order for"? You can use "in order for" to indicate a purpose or a condition that needs to be met for something to happen. Example: "In order for the project to succeed, we need to collaborate effectively."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

For Germany it is redemption; for France a means to amplify French power; for Italians it is not Rome; for Belgians it is not Brussels; for the Baltic states it is a long way from Moscow; for Romania and Bulgaria it is order; for Spain it is the solution; and for much of central Europe it is home.The rest of the world has a stake in what happens in Europe, too.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

I was ordering for drivers".

The New York Times

Ten thousand daisies were ordered for the weekend.

The New Yorker

It can be ordered for January delivery.

The New York Times

Custom sizes can be ordered for $20 a square foot.

The New York Times

Extra security has been ordered for every convoy.

The New York Times

Supplies had to be ordered for the temporary trading room.

The New York Times

The fabrics can be ordered for June delivery.

The New York Times

They can be ordered for $15 each at www.essaycd.com.

The New York Times

Light meals can be ordered for considerably less.

The New York Times - Travel

Note cards with station names can be ordered for $29.95.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "is order for" in your writing. It is grammatically incorrect. Consider using phrases like "in order for" or restructuring your sentence for clarity and correctness.

Common error

A common mistake is to use "is order for" when you mean "in order for". "In order for" introduces a clause of purpose, specifying what must happen to achieve a certain result. Always ensure the phrase correctly conveys the intended meaning of purpose or condition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is order for" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't serve a standard grammatical function. Ludwig AI indicates that the structure is not correct in English. The correct phrasing would typically involve a prepositional phrase indicating purpose or destination.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is order for" is flagged by Ludwig as grammatically incorrect. The correct form to express purpose is "in order for". While the search results provide examples, the instances are limited, and the overall assessment indicates that the phrase should be avoided. Related phrases such as "is intended for" or restructuring the sentence using "in order for" are recommended for clarity and grammatical accuracy. Always aim for precision in conveying purpose, especially in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is a command for

Replaces "order" with "command", implying a directive or instruction.

is a request for

Substitutes "order" with "request", indicating a polite solicitation.

is intended for

Focuses on the purpose or recipient of something.

is made for

Emphasizes the suitability or design of something for a specific purpose.

is arranged for

Highlights the preparation or setup for a particular event or purpose.

is designated for

Specifies that something is officially assigned for a particular use.

is meant for

Indicates the intended purpose or audience.

is scheduled for

Refers to a planned event or activity.

is available for

Indicates something is accessible or ready for use.

is prepared for

Focuses on the readiness or anticipation of something.

FAQs

How to correct the phrase "is order for" in a sentence?

The phrase "is order for" is grammatically incorrect. You can correct it by using "in order for", which introduces a clause of purpose. For example, instead of saying "Action X is order for result Y", say "In order for result Y to happen, action X is needed".

What is the correct way to use "in order for"?

Use "in order for" to introduce a dependent clause that explains the purpose or reason for something. For example, "In order for the project to succeed, we need more resources".

Can I use "to" instead of "in order for"?

Yes, in many cases, you can use "to" instead of "in order for" to express purpose. For instance, instead of "We need to work hard in order for the project to succeed", you can say "We need to work hard to make the project succeed".

What are some alternatives to "is order for" that maintain a similar meaning?

While "is order for" is incorrect, depending on the intended meaning, you could use phrases like "is intended for", "is meant for", or restructure the sentence using "in order for".