Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This confirmatory strategy is not logically sound, though.
Similar(59)
Furthermore, the models produce errors that show a reverse of wear, which is not logically consistent.
It is not logically possible because it is inconsistent with what is logically necessary: the existence of a being (God) who is necessarily omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good.
The two statements are not logically different.
But laws of nature are not logically necessary (that is, denying them is not a contradiction).
It's not logically possible.
Such inferences are not logically trivial.
Unlike these formulas, the sequents are not logically structured.
However, these two results are not logically equivalent.
This is not just a logically consistent argument.
A post at Ethical Realism makes the somewhat surprising claim that good arguments need not be logically sound.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com