is not limited to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'is not limited to' is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it to express that a range of items or possibilities is greater than what has been stated. For example: The courses offered by the university are not limited to history and literature.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Improvement is not limited to simple variables.

Encyclopedia Britannica

This phenomenon is not limited to campuses.

The New York Times

Nostalgia is not limited to sports.

The New York Times

The boom is not limited to America.

The Economist

The scandal is not limited to Germany.

The New York Times

The problem is not limited to summer.

The New York Times

The problem is not limited to war.

The New York Times

The trend is not limited to Istanbul.

The New York Times

This insensitivity is not limited to Sikkim.

The New York Times

This phenomenon is not limited to New York City.

The New York Times - Food

The movement is not limited to New York.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is not limited to", ensure the context clearly indicates what the scope extends to. Avoid ambiguity by providing sufficient details.

Common error

Avoid using "is not limited to" without providing any indication of what else is included. This can leave the reader confused about the actual scope or possibilities.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not limited to" functions as a qualifier, expanding the scope of a statement beyond explicitly mentioned elements. It signals inclusivity rather than exclusivity. As Ludwig AI states, it’s grammatically sound for expressing that a range of possibilities is broader than initially suggested.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

16%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is not limited to" is a grammatically correct and versatile phrase used to indicate that something extends beyond a specific scope. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical soundness and wide applicability. It's prevalent in news, scientific writing, and general communication. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the extended scope to avoid vagueness. While alternatives exist, such as "extends beyond" or "is not restricted to", the key is to maintain the intended meaning of inclusivity. The phrase is useful across registers, making it a valuable tool in various writing contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

includes but is not limited to

Explicitly states that the list is not exhaustive.

is not restricted to

Emphasizes the lack of limitations or constraints.

is not confined to

Stresses the lack of confinement or restriction within a certain area.

extends beyond

Focuses on the idea of something going past a certain boundary.

goes beyond

Implies a progression or expansion beyond a certain point.

encompasses more than

Highlights the inclusion of additional elements or aspects.

is broader than

Indicates a wider scope or range.

is more expansive than

Emphasizes the comprehensive and extensive nature.

is not solely

Highlights that something is not exclusively something else.

is inclusive of

Focuses on the inclusion of various elements.

FAQs

How can I use "is not limited to" in a sentence?

Use "is not limited to" to indicate that a range of items or possibilities is greater than what has been stated. For example, "The courses offered by the university "are not limited to" history and literature".

What phrases can I use instead of "is not limited to"?

You can use alternatives like "extends beyond", "is not restricted to", or "includes but is not limited to" depending on the context.

What's the difference between "is not limited to" and "is specific to"?

"Is not limited to" indicates a broader scope, while "is specific to" implies that something is exclusively related to a particular item or area. They have opposite meanings.

Is it correct to say "is not limited at" instead of "is not limited to"?

No, the correct phrase is "is not limited to". Using "at" instead of "to" is grammatically incorrect.