is not interfered

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not interfered" is not correct in standard English; it should be "is not interfered with." You can use it when describing a situation where something is not being obstructed or disrupted.
Example: "The experiment was conducted in a controlled environment where the results are not interfered with by external factors."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

14 human-written examples

What's more, the binding ability of compound 3 with F− is not interfered by the existence of other anions.

Journal of Luminescence

This provides best interference scenario for the backhaul link that it is not interfered by both the macro and the LPN accesses.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

By implementing the black burst signaling, the CLEAR packet used for multi-hop time slot reservation is not interfered by the single-hop messages.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In order to ensure that the user's receive signal is not interfered by MUI, relative matrices at each BS should satisfy the ZF criterion.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

But there is greater concern about take-off and landing, with authorities keen both to ensure aircraft equipment is not interfered with and that passengers are not overly distracted at "critical" moments.

BBC

The other receptors (2 and 3) show the highest binding ability for acetate (AcO−) among studied anions (fluoride (F−), dihydrogen phosphate (H2PO4−), chloride (Cl−), bromide (Br−), iodide (I−)); and the binding ability for AcO− is not interfered by the existence of other anions.

Biosystems

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Mr. Crowley continued: "This is not interfering in Egyptian affairs.

The New York Times

As someone once said, if he is not interfering with play, what is he doing there?

The New York Times - Sports

In an interview, she said that the missing money "is not interfering with our school programs".

The New York Times

The best thing you can do as a coach is not interfere with a process he fully understands".

The New York Times - Sports

Thus, he said, the union wants to be sure the testing is not interfering with players' health and safety.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When intending to convey that something remains unaffected, use the grammatically correct and widely accepted form "is not interfered with".

Common error

Avoid omitting the preposition 'with' after 'interfered'. The correct phrasing is "is not interfered with". The omission changes the meaning and introduces grammatical errors.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not interfered" functions as a passive construction indicating a lack of obstruction or disruption. Ludwig AI signals that it is grammatically incorrect, it should be "is not interfered with."

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

35%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not interfered" aims to express that something remains unaffected or unobstructed, but it's considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. The correct phrasing is "is not interfered with". This construction appears across varied sources, including science, news, and wikis, indicating common usage despite the grammatical issue. Alternative expressions such as "is not obstructed" or "is not disrupted" can effectively convey a similar meaning while adhering to standard English grammar. When writing, ensure the inclusion of 'with' to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not obstructed

Replaces 'interfered' with 'obstructed', focusing on the idea of something being blocked or hindered.

is not disrupted

Replaces 'interfered' with 'disrupted', emphasizing the idea of something being interrupted or disturbed.

is not hindered

Replaces 'interfered' with 'hindered', highlighting the idea of something being slowed down or impeded.

is not impeded

Replaces 'interfered' with 'impeded', focusing on the idea of something being delayed or prevented.

is not affected

Changes the focus to the lack of influence or impact, rather than direct interference.

is not disturbed

Shifts the focus to a lack of disturbance or agitation.

remains unaffected

Replaces the passive construction with an active one, emphasizing the continuous state of being unaffected.

is left undisturbed

Emphasizes the act of leaving something alone to avoid interference.

is kept separate

Focuses on maintaining a division to prevent unwanted interaction.

operates independently

Highlights the ability to function without external influence or intervention.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something is not affected by disruption?

The correct way to express that something is not affected by disruption is to say it "is not interfered with". While the phrasing "is not interfered" is sometimes used, it's grammatically incorrect. Consider alternatives like "is not disrupted" or "remains unaffected".

Which is correct: "is not interfered" or "is not interfered with"?

"Is not interfered with" is the grammatically correct phrasing. The phrase "is not interfered" is often used but considered incorrect due to the missing preposition "with".

What does it mean when something is described as "not interfered with"?

When something is described as "not interfered with", it means that it hasn't been obstructed, disrupted, or negatively affected by anything else. It implies a state of being unhindered and able to function or exist without external disturbance.

Are there any situations where "is not interfered" is acceptable?

While "is not interfered" is sometimes used, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. It is better to use the correct phrase "is not interfered with" or alternative phrases like "is not obstructed" or "is not hindered".