is not included in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not included in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something is excluded from a particular group, list, or category. Example: "The item you requested is not included in the current inventory list."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Breakfast is not included in these rates.

The New York Times - Travel

It is not included in the advertised rates.

The New York Times

That proposal is not included in the current plans.

The New York Times

Food on Song is not included in the ticket price.

The New York Times - Food

(The curve is not included in the book).

The New Yorker

Membership in the club is not included in the price.

The New York Times

Hot pink lipstick is not included in battle gear.

The New York Times - Science

Ski flying is not included in the Olympics.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But Alisoft is not included in the Hong Kong offering.

The Economist

This time is not included in the films running time.

Independent

Bio compatibility study is not included in this work.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase, ensure the context clearly defines what the subject is excluded from to maintain clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "is not included in" when "does not apply to" is more appropriate. The former implies exclusion from a defined set, while the latter indicates irrelevance.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not included in" primarily functions as a verb phrase indicating exclusion or absence. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is correct and usable in written English, serving to specify that something is not part of a larger set or category.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is not included in" is a grammatically sound and versatile phrase used to indicate that something is excluded from a specific set or category. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is suitable for various writing contexts, ranging from formal to informal. Its neutral register makes it a practical choice for communicating absence in a clear and objective manner. It is frequently found in both scientific and news-related sources. When aiming for semantic alternatives, consider options like "is excluded from" or "is absent from" to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is excluded from

Focuses on the act of being deliberately left out.

is absent from

Highlights the lack of presence within a given context.

does not feature in

Emphasizes the lack of appearance or highlighting.

is omitted from

Indicates a deliberate act of leaving something out.

is left out of

Suggests being unintentionally excluded or forgotten.

is not a component of

Specifies that something does not form a part of a larger whole.

is distinct from

Highlights the separation and difference between two things.

lies outside the scope of

Indicates that something is beyond the defined boundaries or focus.

is not encompassed by

Implies that something is not covered or contained within certain limits.

falls outside of

Indicates that something exists beyond specified constraints.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is not included in"?

You can use alternatives like "is excluded from", "is absent from", or "does not feature in" depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "is not included in"?

Use "is not included in" when you want to specify that something is deliberately or explicitly absent from a particular set, list, or category. For example, "Breakfast is not included in the room rate."

What's the difference between "is not included in" and "is excluded from"?

While both phrases indicate absence, "is excluded from" often suggests a more deliberate or forceful act of keeping something out, whereas "is not included in" can simply indicate that something wasn't part of the original set or plan.

Is "is not included in" formal or informal?

The phrase "is not included in" is suitable for both formal and informal contexts. It is a neutral and straightforward way to express that something is not part of something else.