is not in charge of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not in charge of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone does not have authority or responsibility over a particular task or area. Example: "The assistant is not in charge of making final decisions for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of robots," spokesman Tsutomu Shimomura told the Associated Press.

The Guardian

Labour is not in charge of what is happening, he says.

The Guardian

It's astonishing, too, that the Commons is not in charge of its own business.

The Guardian - Opinion

At times, he acts as if he is not in charge of his own campaign.

The New York Times

The chairman is not in charge of the camp," said Ladonna Bravebull Allard.

The Guardian

But this amounts to little in practice, because Whitehall is not in charge of the matter.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

Contrary to the critics' talking points, Comey was not "in charge" of the investigation.

The Washington Post

You're not "in charge" of everything and everyone around you.

Huffington Post

"The police department isn't in charge of legislation".

The Guardian

But it isn't in charge of its own destiny -- or finances.

The New York Times

Can you bear that she isn't in charge of public health policy?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When clarifying who is in charge, follow the statement with the name of the responsible party to provide complete and actionable information.

Common error

Avoid assuming someone "is not in charge of" a task simply because they are not directly involved in its execution. Verify their actual role and authority before making such statements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not in charge of" functions as a predicate nominative or adjective phrase, indicating a lack of authority or responsibility. It clarifies who does not hold control over a particular area or task, as demonstrated by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

58%

Academia

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Science

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not in charge of" is a versatile and frequently used expression for specifying a lack of authority or responsibility. Ludwig AI analysis confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and suitable for various contexts, although predominantly found in News & Media sources. When writing, use this phrase to define roles clearly and avoid ambiguity. Be mindful of the potential for misattributing responsibility and always verify the correct assignment of tasks. Consider using alternative phrasing such as "does not oversee" or "is not responsible for" to refine the nuance of your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not responsible for

Focuses on the absence of accountability for a specific task or area.

is not accountable for

Highlights the lack of liability for specific actions.

does not oversee

Uses a different verb to indicate a lack of supervisory role.

has no control over

Highlights the lack of influence or command.

lacks authority over

Emphasizes the absence of formal power or control.

is not the supervisor of

Specifies that someone does not hold a supervisory position.

is not the manager of

Indicates the absence of managerial duties.

is not tasked with

Implies that a responsibility or assignment isn't there.

is not empowered to

Suggests that they have no permission to do something.

has no jurisdiction over

Focuses on the absence of legal authority.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is not in charge of"?

You can use alternatives such as "does not oversee", "is not responsible for", or "lacks authority over" depending on the context.

What does it mean when someone "is not in charge of" something?

It means that the person does not have the primary responsibility or authority for managing or directing that particular task, area, or project.

Is it formal to use "is not in charge of"?

The phrase "is not in charge of" is appropriate for both formal and informal contexts. More formal alternatives include "does not oversee" or "is not accountable for".

When should I use "is not in charge of" versus "is not responsible for"?

"Is not in charge of" implies a lack of direct control or management, while "is not responsible for" suggests a lack of accountability for outcomes. The best choice depends on the specific nuance you wish to convey.