is not implicated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not implicated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone or something is not involved or connected to a particular situation or issue. Example: "In the investigation, it was determined that she is not implicated in any wrongdoing."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Ray Borane is not implicated in the case.

The New York Times

Mr. Obama is not implicated in that case.

The New York Times

She is not implicated in the alleged conspiracy.

The Guardian

It is important to note what is not implicated by this decision.

Harvard University

The United States is not implicated in any of the criminal charges related to the operation.

The New York Times

This substantive state policy is not implicated here, where sanctions were imposed for conduct during the litigation.

Cornell University

Mr Gavaghan is not implicated in the other widespread allegations of torture, rape and murder detailed in the programme.

The Guardian

The closest is Robert Thomson, editor of the Wall Street Journal, who is not implicated in this scandal.

The New Yorker

Ms Rousseff, who once chaired the Petrobras board, is not implicated.

Independent

Justice Thomas also said it was "important to note what is not implicated by this decision".

The New York Times

This issue, however, was not raised in defendant's motion for summary judgment, was not addressed by the district court, and is not implicated here.

Harvard University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is not implicated", ensure the context clearly defines what the subject is not involved in to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "is not implicated" vaguely. Always specify the context or situation from which the subject is excluded. For example, instead of saying "He is not implicated", specify "He is not implicated in the scandal".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not implicated" functions as a predicate in a sentence, specifically indicating the absence of involvement or connection of the subject with a particular situation or action. Ludwig provides many examples to confirm this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

31%

Academia

19%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is not implicated" is a commonly used phrase to denote a lack of involvement or connection, particularly in situations with legal or ethical implications. Ludwig's AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically sound and appropriate for use in formal contexts. While alternatives like ""is not involved"" exist, "is not implicated" carries a nuance of exoneration, suggesting a potential previous suspicion. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding the context from which the subject is excluded. The phrase appears most frequently in News & Media, Science, and Academia, reflecting its role in objective reporting and analysis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not involved

This alternative is a more direct and commonly used way of expressing a lack of involvement.

is not associated

This alternative suggests a lack of connection or relationship with something.

is not connected

This alternative emphasizes the absence of a link or relationship.

is not linked

Similar to "is not connected", this highlights the absence of a direct link.

is not tied

This implies that there is no binding relationship or connection.

is not related

This alternative indicates a general lack of relevance or connection.

is not a part of

This phrase explicitly states that something is not included or involved.

plays no role

This alternative emphasizes the absence of any active involvement.

bears no responsibility

This suggests a lack of accountability or blame in a situation.

is not culpable

This alternative formally states that someone is not deserving of blame.

FAQs

What does "is not implicated" mean?

The phrase "is not implicated" means that someone or something is not involved or connected to a particular situation, especially a negative or criminal one. It suggests a lack of culpability or responsibility.

How to use "is not implicated" in a sentence?

Use "is not implicated" to state that a person, group, or thing has no connection to a specific event or action. For example, "The investigation showed that the company "is not involved" in the fraud."

What can I say instead of "is not implicated"?

You can use alternatives like ""is not involved"", "is not connected", or "is not associated" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "is not involved" or "is not implicated"?

While both phrases convey a lack of involvement, "is not implicated" often suggests a more formal or legal context, implying that someone was suspected but cleared. "Is not involved" is a more general and widely applicable alternative.