is not effectual

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not effectual" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is ineffective or not producing the desired result. Example: "The new policy is not effectual in reducing employee turnover as anticipated."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Teaching the social determinants of health using classroom methods and medical settings is not effectual, yet few institutions require students to undertake placements in non-clinical settings.

Public Health

Conventionally optimal medication and management is not effectual and no therapeutic preparation is particularly successful [ 26, 28] as gold standard treatment is lacking [ 29, 30].

BMC Biotechnology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

However, further attempts with increase in reaction time and replacing toluene with acetonitrile or solvent free conditions, were not effectual (Table 1, entry 5 8).

Chemistry Central Journal

Up to now, we also were not effectual in implementing our technology in a comparison group of conventional physicians.

BMC Geriatrics

In China the Great Firewall is not nearly as effectual as the government would have you believe.

TechCrunch

The prime minister declared: "This was a committee which was not very effectual".

The Guardian

And that is because they are not an effectual electoral threat.

Independent

He told ABC radio: "There was a committee that was not very effectual and the chairman of the committee is now the departmental medical officer who is providing advice in a more sustained way".

The Guardian

Alternatively, the observed correlations for the HC data sets could be the result of inferring procedures that are not completely effectual.

Plosone

Most of the currently available de novo methods, such as RECON (Bao and Eddy 2002), REPuter (Kurtz et al. 2001), RepeatFinder (Volfovsky et al. 2001), and PILER (Edgar and Myers 2005), are being based on self-alignment approaches and are effectual only where sequence information is not limited in terms of sequence coverage or contiguity.

Rice

The effectual dose of drugs, mostly different antimonials, is not much lower than the toxic one.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Be mindful of the context; "effectual" carries a slightly more formal tone than its alternatives, making it suitable for academic or professional writing, but potentially less appropriate for casual communication.

Common error

Avoid using "is not effectual" in contexts where simpler, more direct language would be more appropriate. Overly formal phrasing can make your writing sound stilted or unnatural.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not effectual" functions as a negative predicate adjective, describing a subject as lacking the ability to produce a desired effect or result. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness. Its use indicates a judgment about the effectiveness of something.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

10%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not effectual" signifies a lack of effectiveness or the failure to produce a desired result. While grammatically correct, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is less common than alternatives like "is not effective" or "is ineffective". Its usage leans towards formal and scientific contexts. When writing, consider whether a more common synonym would enhance clarity. While "is not effectual" is acceptable, being mindful of audience and context is crucial for effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is ineffective

Direct synonym, replacing "effectual" with its more common counterpart "effective".

is not effective

Direct synonym, emphasizing the absence of effect or impact.

is unsuccessful

Indicates a failure to achieve a desired outcome or goal.

is without effect

More formal phrasing, highlighting the lack of any discernible consequence.

is of no avail

Suggests that despite effort, there is no positive result or benefit.

fails to deliver

Implies a failure to meet expectations or produce the promised outcome.

is unproductive

Focuses on the lack of positive output or results from a process or action.

does not work

Simple and direct, indicating a malfunction or failure to operate as intended.

is impotent

Suggests a lack of power or ability to produce the desired effect; can sometimes carry a negative connotation.

is in vain

Emphasizes the futility of an action, suggesting that it will not achieve its intended purpose.

FAQs

What does "is not effectual" mean?

The phrase "is not effectual" means something is ineffective or does not produce the desired result. It's a more formal way of saying something "is not effective".

Which is a better choice, "is not effectual" or "is not effective"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct, "is not effective" is generally preferred due to its broader usage and accessibility. "Is not effectual" can sound overly formal.

What can I say instead of "is not effectual"?

You can use alternatives like "is ineffective", "is unsuccessful", or "does not work" depending on the specific context.

Is it ever better to use "is not effectual" over "is not effective"?

In highly formal or academic writing, "is not effectual" might be appropriate to maintain a certain tone. However, "is not effective" is generally a safer and more widely understood choice.