is not cost effective

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is not cost effective" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the financial efficiency or value of a particular action, project, or investment. Example: "After reviewing the budget, we concluded that the current marketing strategy is not cost effective for our goals."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

It is not cost effective to supply grid electricity to rural populations.

The Guardian

But we recognise that is not cost effective at the moment.

Independent

She warned: "It is not cost effective to drop something with which you have had some success.

Independent

They've actually built special-purpose hardware for doing this, which we've found is not cost effective.

TechCrunch

All of these consequences added to the secondary fragmentation costs, which is not cost effective.

International Journal of Geo-Engineering

However, ACO is not cost effective compared with PSO and SA in terms of execution time.

Vietnam Journal of Computer Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Vaccine stockpiling is not cost-effective in most scenarios even with 100% vaccine effectiveness.

Plosone

Having a high turnover of staff is not cost-effective.

The Guardian

It is not cost-effective for production of biofuel.

The New York Times

The scheme is not cost-effective and has little public support".

The Guardian - Business

Simply put, they may have concluded that reading is not cost-effective.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When arguing that something "is not cost effective", provide specific data or examples to support your claim. Quantify the costs and benefits whenever possible to strengthen your argument.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that something "is not cost effective" without providing any context or supporting evidence. This weakens your argument and makes it less persuasive.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is not cost effective" functions as a predicate adjective, describing a subject as lacking financial efficiency or value. It expresses a judgment about the relationship between expenses and outcomes, indicating that the costs outweigh the benefits. Ludwig confirms its correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

37%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is not cost effective" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate that the expenses associated with something outweigh its benefits. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability across various contexts. While it appears frequently in scientific, news and media, and formal business domains, it's crucial to support its use with concrete data or examples to bolster your argument. Alternatives include phrases like "is economically unfeasible" and "is not economically viable", which offer similar meanings but can add nuance depending on the context. Avoid using the phrase without providing any supporting context or evidence, as this weakens your argument and reduces its persuasiveness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is economically unfeasible

Focuses on the economic viability, emphasizing that it cannot be sustained financially.

is not economically viable

Highlights the economic sustainability, indicating that it won't succeed from a financial standpoint.

is inefficient from a financial perspective

Emphasizes the financial inefficiency, pointing out poor resource allocation.

does not represent a good investment

Shifts the focus to investment return, suggesting it's not a worthwhile financial outlay.

is not a good use of resources

Indicates the inefficient use of resources, implying better alternatives exist.

is a waste of money

Directly states that the money spent provides no value, a strong negative connotation.

is a losing proposition

Frames it as a situation where losses are expected, implying poor financial results.

is not a sound financial choice

Highlights the lack of financial prudence, suggesting it's an unwise decision.

exceeds the allocated budget without delivering commensurate benefits

Details the problem: higher spending without a fair increase in profits.

offers a poor return on investment

Highlights the investment's poor return, indicating minimal gains compared to the cost.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "is not cost effective" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "is economically unfeasible", "is not economically viable", or "is inefficient from a financial perspective".

What's the difference between "is not cost effective" and "is not cost beneficial"?

"Is not cost effective" focuses on whether the cost justifies the outcome, while "is not cost beneficial" directly compares the costs and benefits to determine if the benefits outweigh the costs. They are largely interchangeable but emphasize slightly different aspects.

In what situations is it appropriate to use the phrase "is not cost effective"?

Use "is not cost effective" when you want to argue that the expenses associated with a particular action, project, or product do not provide sufficient value or return. This can apply to business decisions, healthcare policies, or personal finance.

What are some less common but equally valid alternatives to "is not cost effective"?

Consider using phrases like "is a losing proposition" or "offers a poor return on investment" for stronger negative connotations. These highlight the financial downsides more explicitly.