Sentence examples for is not clearly detectable from inspiring English sources

The proposed T2 chart based on the energy profiles shows a potential in early detecting the abnormality of a monitoring system which is not clearly detectable in original time scales.

As seen in Figure 1, the change in conductivity does not show an abrupt alteration and the intersection point is not clearly detectable.

However, PLEKHA7 differs from afadin and ZO-1, because it is not clearly detectable in junctions of endothelial cells, that contain VE-cadherin, afadin and p120ctn [33].

Cuff is also found in isolated foci dispersed in the nuclei, where HP1 is not clearly detectable.

High-precision magnetic satellite observations enabled the observation of F region ionospheric currents at low- and midlatitudes, which are not clearly detectable on ground since they are masked by E region currents during day or because their signals during nighttime are too weak to be detected at such far distance (see Olsen and Stolle 2012).

In the cases in which the ChAT bands were not clearly detectable as in the retinal periphery, the RGCs were not analysed.

Integrin αvβ5 was detected at a low level on HT-29 and LS174T cells and was not clearly detectable on HCT-8 and T84 cells.

The ascorbate/TMPD-dependent state 4 respiration in liver mitochondria was not clearly detectable in one endotoxemic animal, and consequently the RCR could not be calculated.

Although the Sema3g in situ hybridization signal was not clearly detectable, the expression of SEMA3G using Sema3g lacZ/+ heterozygous embryos, carrying a lacZ reporter cassette under the endogenous Sema3g promoter, was restricted to arteries and is not expressed in veins or lymphatic vessels within the skin (Fig. 2E,E′; Kutschera et al., 2011).

On the other hand, nuclear medicine provides whole-body imaging, allowing extensive in vivo characterization of the tumor that is potentially useful for guiding biopsy, in particular of FDG-avid lesions that are not clearly detectable on CT or are largely necrotized or are avid in only a part (Fig. 7).

These previously unknown splice variants were not clearly detectable in RNase protection assays (Dejosez et al, 2000), because only 43 bp (TRAIL- β) or 181 bp (TRAIL- γ) differences in length were found in comparison with the primarily identified TRAIL- α transcript (Wiley et al, 1995; Pitti et al, 1996).