is less rich

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is less rich" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to compare the richness or quality of something, indicating that it has a lower level of richness than another item or concept. Example: "The second version of the story is less rich in detail compared to the first."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

The grafted styrene/methyl methacrylate copolymer is less rich in styrene than the free copolymer.

Polymer

Beaufort d'hiver (winter beaufort) is made when the cows are in their sheds and the milk is less rich.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Ramírez's art is less rich in formal invention than Wölfli's and in poetic resonance than Darger's, but it is more stylistically resolved and emotionally concentrated.

The New Yorker

Omanis note that their country is less rich than neighbouring Saudi Arabia, but their ruler has done much more with its wealth.

The Economist

The vegetation of the High Arctic is less rich than that of the Low Arctic, containing only about half the vascular plant species found in the Low Arctic.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The high comedy is here - his buying-off of a former mistress with the help of Jonathan Aitken and a briefcase with a bugging device is one for the anthologies - but it is less rich than the previous volume.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

Is Zuckerberg correct in saying that text-based communications are less "rich" than video-based or 3D ones – and that VR would really get us "closer and closer" to capturing "natural experience"?

The Guardian - Tech

Better to be less rich than less secure.

The Washington Post

For a family pudding, the custard can be less rich.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

But it will be less rich, less clear and therefore probably less useful.

The Economist

They are less rich than financial-services firms and less appealing to politicians than technology companies.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is less rich" in comparative contexts, ensure that you clearly specify what it is being compared to. This helps avoid ambiguity and strengthens the statement's clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "is less rich" without providing specific details about the aspect in which something lacks richness. Otherwise, the statement may appear vague and lack impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is less rich" primarily functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It serves to describe a noun by indicating a deficiency in richness relative to another noun. Ludwig provides numerous examples showcasing this function across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

42%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is less rich" functions as a comparative adjective phrase to indicate a deficiency in richness. As indicated by Ludwig, it is grammatically correct and frequently used across various contexts, including science, news media, encyclopedias, and wikis. The phrase is suitable for neutral to formal registers. To enhance clarity, it's important to specify the aspect in which something lacks richness when employing this phrase. Related alternatives include "is not as rich", "is poorer in", and "lacks richness".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not as rich

This alternative maintains a similar meaning by negating the quality of richness. It is a direct substitution, focusing on the comparative absence of richness.

is poorer in

This alternative employs "poorer" to convey a lack of richness. It emphasizes the deficiency in a specific aspect or quality.

lacks richness

This alternative directly states the absence of richness. It is a more assertive way of expressing the deficiency.

is deficient in

This alternative highlights a deficit or inadequacy. It is suitable when describing a lack of essential qualities.

is wanting in

This alternative suggests a lack or absence of something desired or needed. It has a slightly more formal tone.

is not abundant

This alternative focuses on the quantity of something rather than its qualitative richness. It is appropriate when discussing resources or elements that are not plentiful.

is sparsely populated

This alternative describes a low density or number of items, often in the context of populations or data points. It's appropriate when referring to a limited amount or presence.

is less bountiful

This alternative expresses a reduced abundance or generosity. It's suitable when describing harvests, yields, or natural resources.

is not overflowing with

This alternative emphasizes that there isn't a lot of something. It's appropriate when suggesting a lack or limited resource.

is scant in

This alternative indicates a minimal or insufficient amount of something. It is suitable when highlighting a severe lack or shortage.

FAQs

What does "is less rich" mean?

The phrase "is less rich" means something has fewer desirable or valuable qualities compared to something else. This can refer to tangible things like soil or food, or abstract concepts like culture or experiences.

What can I say instead of "is less rich"?

You can use alternatives like "is not as rich", "is poorer in", or "lacks richness" depending on the context.

How can I use "is less rich" in a sentence?

You can use "is less rich" to compare the qualities of two things, such as "This soil is less rich in nutrients than the other soil." or "The sequel's plot is less rich in character development than the original film."

Is it better to say "is less rich" or "is poorer"?

Both "is less rich" and "is poorer" can be used, but they carry slightly different connotations. "Is less rich" often refers to a lack of complexity or depth, while "is poorer" may imply a more significant deficiency. Consider the specific context to determine which is more appropriate.