is less comprehensive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is less comprehensive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the thoroughness or detail of two or more subjects, indicating that one is not as complete as the other. Example: "The new report is less comprehensive than the previous one, lacking several key details."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

33 human-written examples

The rail system is less comprehensive, but is part of the InterRail network and offers some spectacular journeys.

The Guardian - Travel

Though efficient, the system is less comprehensive than that of São Paulo or major metropolitan areas in the Northern Hemisphere.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The European Union's banned list is less comprehensive, because it covers only airlines that are judged not safe and that want to fly to Europe.

The New York Times

Mr. Mills and Mr. Klein have both repeatedly said that the national test is less comprehensive because not all students are required to take it, and it is not aligned with state curriculums.

The New York Times

As editor in chief of the Library of America, I was surprised and puzzled by William Pratt's letter (Feb. 29) claiming that the Library of America's "Ezra Pound: Poems and Translations" is less comprehensive than it "purports to be".

The New York Times - Books

The book he has written is less comprehensive, less objective and far more coldblooded than recent television documentaries about ground zero like "America Rebuilds," on PBS, or "The World Trade Center: Rise and Fall of an American Icon," on the History Channel.

The New York Times - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

25 human-written examples

The curbs on her ability to shop in London may be less comprehensive than previously thought.

The Guardian

But as a result, Google Shopping's listings are less comprehensive than they were before.

The New York Times

But the search function and graphics were less comprehensive and more cramped, and the software was slower than Google Maps.

The New York Times - Tech

But it's less comprehensive, though perhaps more intimate, like stepping into a rich girlfriend's boudoir.

The New York Times

But on the downside, the insured care would be less comprehensive than under current definitions of Obamacare's mandate.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing two or more items, clearly identify both to ensure the context of what "is less comprehensive" is understood. For example, "The first draft is less comprehensive than the final version."

Common error

Don't use the phrase without specifying what the subject is less comprehensive than. A vague statement like "The analysis is less comprehensive" leaves the reader wondering what it's being compared to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is less comprehensive" functions as a comparative adjective phrase. It's used to describe a subject that has fewer details, a narrower scope, or less thorough coverage compared to another. As Ludwig AI explains, it's a usable and correct way to compare the thoroughness of two or more subjects.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

54%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

8%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is less comprehensive" is a grammatically sound and commonly used comparative adjective phrase. According to Ludwig AI, it accurately conveys that one subject is not as thorough or detailed as another. Predominantly found in News & Media and Science contexts, it maintains a neutral to formal register. For optimal use, specify the subjects being compared to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives include "is not as thorough" and "is more limited in scope". With high source quality and consistent usage, this phrase remains a valuable tool for precise comparison in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is not as thorough

Focuses on the lack of thoroughness or completeness.

is more limited in scope

Highlights the restricted range or extent.

is not as exhaustive

Emphasizes the absence of an in-depth treatment.

is more superficial

Suggests a lack of depth or attention to detail.

is a briefer overview

Indicates a shorter or more concise summary.

is a narrower perspective

Points to a restricted viewpoint or focus.

is not as detailed

Emphasizes the lack of specific information.

is a partial account

Implies that only a portion of the whole is presented.

is a selective presentation

Highlights the choosing of particular aspects while omitting others.

is a condensed version

Signifies a shortened or abridged form.

FAQs

How can I use "is less comprehensive" in a sentence?

You can use "is less comprehensive" to compare the thoroughness of two subjects. For example, "This report is less comprehensive than the previous one, lacking detailed financial data."

What are some alternatives to "is less comprehensive"?

Alternatives include "is not as thorough", "is more limited in scope", or "is not as exhaustive", depending on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use "is less comprehensive"?

Use "is less comprehensive" when you want to indicate that something does not cover as much detail or as many aspects as something else. It's suitable for academic, professional, and general contexts.

What's the difference between "is less comprehensive" and "is incomplete"?

"Is less comprehensive" implies that something covers the subject but not as thoroughly as something else. "Is incomplete" ("is incomplete") suggests that something is missing essential parts or is unfinished.