Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We defined four criteria to assess each grouping scheme: (1) the subgroups defined by T, N, and M comprising a given group within a grouping scheme have similar survival rates (hazard consistency); (2) the survival rates differ among the groups (hazard discrimination); (3) the prediction of cure is high (outcome prediction); and (4) the distribution of patients among the groups is balanced.
Similar(59)
The number of interacting agents, components, and forces that influence people and organisations in a given system is high, outcomes are sensitive to initial conditions, and thus outcomes are likely to show high variability.
If screening participation is maintained at baseline levels, whatever they may be, and vaccine coverage is high, the outcome is good in all scenarios (Table 3).
The acceptance among patients and psychotherapists is high, clinical outcomes are comparable with usual care [ 14- 16].
High variance of ( xi_{s} = c^{T} x + d_{s}^{T} y_{s} ) shows that there is high fluctuation in outcome.
When R 01 is high, a moderate outcome results, because inter-strain competition is more effective.
Although the prevalence of cataract surgery is high, poor visual outcome following cataract surgery is a matter of concern.
Related mortality and morbidity is high, and functional outcomes are poor.
The risk of deep postoperative infection in these procedures is high and the outcomes can be devastating.
Not because this outcome is high frequency, but because a few massive funds need it to be so.
The primary outcome is high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com