is funded for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is funded for" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct form would be "is funded by" or "is funded for a specific purpose." Example: "The project is funded by the government to improve local infrastructure."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

HMRC said: "The NHS trust will incur VAT on the cost of buying the drugs which it cannot reclaim, but the NHS is funded for their irrecoverable VAT under Government funding arrangements".

Independent

The Berkeley CUP competition is funded for three years by the U.S. Department of Energy as part of a national, $2.5 million program announced in June to commercialize new technologies that reduce carbon pollution and grow the clean energy economy.

University of California, Berkeley

And shortages, in countries where they exist, can be alleviated by reforms changing the way nursing education is funded, for instance, that would help to improve their ailing state-run health systems.A good prognosisWhat is more, there are good reasons for thinking that medical tourism will help poor countries.

The Economist

As reported by the Guardian on Sunday, the 400m runner Matthew Hudson-Smith – who made such an impact in his debut season with 4x400m gold at the Commonwealth Games and individual European Championship silver – is funded for the first time, as is the 17-year-old heptathlete Morgan Lake, who gets podium-potential funding for athletes considered medal contenders for Tokyo 2020.

The Guardian - Sport

Initially, the rover is funded for two Earth years of operations.

BBC

The Project is funded for a period of 2.5 years starting 19 September 2005.

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

All we need is funding for the African troops".

The Guardian - Opinion

What's needed is funding for domestic violence services.

The Guardian - Opinion

So too is funding for basic scientific research.

Huffington Post

It was funded for three years.

Nature

Some are not ready to be funded, for various reasons.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating the source of funding, use "is funded by" (e.g., "The project is funded by the government"). To specify the purpose of the funding, consider using "is funded to" or "is funded for a specific purpose" but restructure the sentence for better clarity (e.g., "The project receives funding to improve local infrastructure").

Common error

Avoid using "is funded for" without careful consideration. This construction is often grammatically weak. Opt for clearer alternatives like "is funded by" to denote the funding source or rephrase to emphasize the purpose of the funding more effectively.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is funded for" typically functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject receives financial backing for a specific reason. As noted by Ludwig AI, this construction is not considered standard written English, so it is better to find alternative phrasing.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

32%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

16%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "is funded for" appears in various contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard written English, according to Ludwig AI. The preferred alternative is "is funded by" when specifying the source of funds. If the intention is to clarify the purpose, rephrasing the sentence for improved clarity is advisable. As observed from the provided examples, this phrase is used in news, science and academic contexts, but clarity and correctness should always be prioritized. Always consider if phrases like "receives funding to" or "is financed by" might serve your message better.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is financed for

Replaces "funded" with "financed", indicating monetary backing for a specific duration or project.

is sponsored for

Substitutes "funded" with "sponsored", implying support from an organization in exchange for promotion or recognition.

is supported for

Uses "supported" instead of "funded", suggesting a broader range of assistance beyond just financial.

receives funding for

Employs "receives funding" to emphasize the act of obtaining financial resources for a purpose.

is granted funds for

Replaces "funded" with "granted funds", specifying that the financial support is awarded through a grant.

is allocated budget for

Uses "allocated budget" instead of "funded", focusing on the budgetary resources assigned for a specific activity.

is provisioned budget for

Replaces "is granted budget" with "provisioned budget", focusing on the budgetary resources assigned for a specific activity.

is compensated for

Substitutes "funded" with "compensated", suggesting that the action is to make amends for the duration or project.

is credited for

Replaces "funded" with "credited", implying recognition for contribution.

is accounted for

Substitutes "funded" with "accounted", implying recognition of a specific project.

FAQs

What is the correct way to indicate the source of funding?

The grammatically correct way to indicate the source of funding is to use "is funded by", as in "This research is funded by the National Institute of Health".

How can I specify the purpose of funding more clearly?

Instead of "is funded for", rephrase to emphasize the purpose. For instance, use "receives funding to" or restructure the sentence entirely to highlight the goal. For example: "The program "receives funding to" support student scholarships".

What are some alternatives to "is funded for" that maintain a professional tone?

Alternatives include "is financed by", "is sponsored by", or "receives financial support from". These options offer clarity and maintain a formal tone.

Is "is funded for" always incorrect?

While often misused, "is funded for" might appear in contexts where the "for" indicates a duration, but restructuring the sentence is generally recommended for clarity. Consider alternatives like "is funded for three years" but strive for clearer phrasing.