is fraught with

USAGE SUMMARY

'is fraught with' is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to indicate that something is full of (often negative) possibilities, risks, or complications. For example: "Journey into the unknown is fraught with danger."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Denial is fraught with peril.

Independent

The political situation is fraught with uncertainty.

The New York Times

But it is fraught with peril.

The Economist

But this, too, is fraught with difficulties.

The Economist

But the look is fraught with peril.

The New York Times

But the process is fraught with risk.

The Economist

Each option is fraught with political dangers.

The New York Times

But the method is fraught with problems.

The New York Times

"Nearly every one is fraught with problems".

The New York Times

The proposed solution is fraught with problems.

The New York Times

Innovation, by definition, is fraught with risk.

Design Provocations Applying Agile Methods to Disruptive Innovation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "is fraught with" to add depth and gravity when describing situations involving significant risk or difficulty. It's particularly effective in formal writing and when emphasizing potential negative consequences.

Common error

Avoid using "is fraught with" for minor inconveniences or low-stakes situations. The phrase implies substantial challenges or dangers, and overuse can dilute its impact.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is fraught with" functions as a predicative adjective that modifies a noun. It emphasizes the presence of potential difficulties, dangers, or risks associated with the subject. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

28%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "is fraught with" is a versatile and commonly used phrase to express the presence of potential risks, difficulties, or dangers. It functions as a predicative adjective, modifying a noun and adding depth to the description of a situation. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and frequent usage across various contexts, including news, science, and academia. When writing, it's essential to use the phrase appropriately, reserving it for situations with genuine challenges to avoid diluting its impact. Alternatives like "is filled with" or "presents many challenges" can be used depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is filled with

Focuses on the abundance of something, often negative, similar to "is fraught with".

is laden with

Implies a heavy burden of something, emphasizing the weight of the potential problems.

is beset by

Highlights the persistent presence of problems or difficulties.

is riddled with

Suggests that something is extensively affected by negative elements.

is attended by

Indicates that certain consequences or problems invariably accompany something.

is characterized by

Emphasizes the defining presence of negative aspects.

is subject to

Highlights the vulnerability to experiencing negative outcomes.

is exposed to

Indicates the potential for encountering negative influences or risks.

is vulnerable to

Stresses the susceptibility to negative impacts or dangers.

presents many challenges

Shifts the focus to the difficulties something poses, rather than inherent risks.

FAQs

How do I use "is fraught with" in a sentence?

Use "is fraught with" to indicate that a situation or activity is filled with potential risks, dangers, or difficulties. For example, "The journey /s/into+uncharted+territory is fraught with danger".

What's a good alternative to "is fraught with"?

Depending on the specific context, you can use phrases like "is filled with", "is laden with", or "presents many challenges" to convey a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say something "is fraught with" positive aspects?

While grammatically correct, "is fraught with" typically carries a negative connotation, implying risks and difficulties. It's more common and idiomatic to use it in contexts involving challenges rather than benefits.

What distinguishes "is fraught with" from "is full of"?

"Is full of" is a neutral expression, whereas "is fraught with" suggests the presence of potential dangers, problems, or anxieties. "Is full of opportunities" is correct, while "is fraught with opportunities" would be atypical.