Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
This ontological dispensation is explicitly embraced by McDowell (1996: 179).
This possibility is explicitly embraced in the Philebus: just as believing is still belief even if it is not directed towards anything that was, is, or will be, so too pleasure is still pleasure, fear fear, anger anger and so on, even if they are directed towards something that never was, is, or will be (40c-e).
Similar(56)
On one reading of this remark, Descartes is explicitly embracing the consequence of having defined knowledge wholly in terms of unshakable conviction: he's conceding that achieving the brand of knowledge he seeks is compatible with being — "absolutely speaking" — in error.
It is explicitly mysterious.
Tudor City is explicitly mentioned.
It is explicitly self-help".
Carter's perspective is explicitly religious.
Sometimes the purpose is explicitly polemical.
Instead of unipolarity, multipolarity is explicitly recognised.
"It is explicitly framed in populist language".
But nothing is explicitly stated.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com