is exact to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is exact to" is not correct in standard written English.
A more appropriate phrase would be "is exact for" or "is exact in relation to." Example: "The measurement is exact for the specifications provided."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Wiki

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The optical clock based on it is exact to 17 digits after the decimal point.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

Ten, to be exact.

The New York Times

Battery Park City, to be exact.

The New Yorker

Forty-six years, to be exact.

The New Yorker

Actually, 0.015%, to be exact.

The Guardian

"Five times, to be exact".

The New Yorker

To be exact, 4.4 miles.

The New York Times - Science

Blue jeans to be exact.

The New Yorker

Municipal bonds to be exact.

The New York Times

Brentwood, Tenn., to be exact.

The New York Times

Product Red, to be exact.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using "is exact for" or "is exact in relation to" to ensure grammatical correctness. For example: "The measurement is exact for the specifications provided."

Common error

Avoid using "to" after "exact" when expressing a relationship or precision. Use "for" or "in relation to" instead to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is exact to" functions as a copular verb followed by an adjective and a preposition. However, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. As Ludwig AI points out, a more appropriate construction would use "for" or "in relation to."

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Wiki

30%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "is exact to" may appear in some sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, better alternatives include "is exact for" or "is exact in relation to". Usage is rare, and although found across various source types, it's best to avoid this phrase in formal writing. Remember that while the intention is to convey precision or accuracy, the incorrect preposition undermines the clarity and correctness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is precise to

Uses 'precise' instead of 'exact', implying a high degree of accuracy.

is accurate to

Substitutes 'exact' with 'accurate', indicating correctness and freedom from error.

is correct to

Replaces 'exact' with 'correct', emphasizing conformity to fact or truth.

is true to

Uses 'true' instead of 'exact', highlighting fidelity to a standard or requirement.

is faithful to

Employs 'faithful' to convey adherence to an original or standard.

is in agreement with

This phrase describes alignment or correspondence with a standard.

is in compliance with

Indicates adherence to regulations or requirements.

conforms to

Highlights alignment with rules or expectations.

corresponds to

Suggests a direct relationship or matching with something else.

matches precisely

Emphasizes the perfect correspondence between two things.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "is exact to"?

You can use phrases like "is exact for" or "is exact in relation to". For example, "The copy "is exact for" the original" or "the measurement "is precise for" the target".

How can I use "is exact" in a sentence correctly?

Ensure you follow "is exact" with a preposition like "for" or "in relation to", clarifying the object or standard to which it's exact. For instance, "This replica "is exact for" its predecessor".

What does it mean when something is described as "exact"?

When something is described as "exact", it implies a high degree of accuracy, precision, and conformity to a standard or original. Synonyms include "precise", "accurate", and "correct".

Which is correct, "is exact to" or "is exact for"?

The correct phrase is "is exact for". The phrase "is exact to" "is incorrect" in standard English.