Similar(60)
Remark 3.1 In Theorem 3.5, the conditions (C10) and (C11) can be replaced by the following, which is evident from the proof.
Then, (1.2) has at least one solution in (BC[0, ∞)) n. We also have a remark similar to Remark 3.1. Remark 5.1 In Theorem 5.5 the conditions (C10) w and (C11) w can be replaced by the following, this is evident from the proof.
Proof The proof is evident.
The proof is evident: if you have a perfectly grilled piece of meat, the addition of sauce can only diminish it.
The proof is evident.
With Eq. (6) proof is evident.
With Remark 1. proof is evident.
The proof is evident due to Theorem 17.
Regarding to Eqs. (9) and (6) proof is evident.
The proof is evident from Eq. (7), which is true for all A. □.
The proof is evident in the damage wrought all over this country after the factories started closing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com