Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "is disenfranchised for" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe the action of depriving someone of their right to vote, participate, or be represented in a particular situation or context. Example: She is disenfranchised for not being a registered voter in the state.
Exact(1)
This is worse for African Americans as one out of 13 is disenfranchised for this very reason.
Similar(59)
Hundreds of thousands of voters were disenfranchised for lack of new biometric identification cards.
In a special election for mayor on Nov. 8, 1932, you could have been disenfranchised for being too short.
The final screen indicated that the only citizens who remain categorically excluded today are those convicted of serious crimes, who in some states are disenfranchised for life.
The court, in a unanimous decision, said that voters should not be disenfranchised "for a mistake of election officials in performing the duty cast upon them".
The state has a low threshold for felonious acts: Someone who gets into a bar fight, or steals property worth $300 — approximately two pairs of Air Jordans — or even drives without a license for a third time can be disenfranchised for life.
Not surprisingly, this was litigated in Ohio, with a federal court ruling that voters should not be disenfranchised for being directed by an election worker to the wrong precinct.
That voter is disenfranchised by error.
Librarians and library users have responded furiously, arguing that libraries provide services that could never be matched by a private company, that they are key places for those who are disenfranchised to use services, and represent value for money for the taxpayer.
As he began to "understand the complexities of migration for communities that are disenfranchised at home and abroad", he resolved to make a direct impact on people's lives.
The fact that this patently does not happen leads directly to the belief on the part of a large part of the electorate that they are disenfranchised as losers whose views count for nothing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com