Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(29)
The existence of such a formula implies that the resultant piezomagnetic field is determined uniquely, regardless of the non-uniqueness of the explicit distribution of the initial magnetization intensities.
We note that (a(g)) is determined uniquely up to g, and from this uniqueness property the following corollary is obvious.
The distribution of the points (mathbf{y}_{j} ) is determined uniquely by d.
It is easily seen that solution u is determined uniquely up to a real constant.
The problem addressed here is whether the piezomagnetic field is determined uniquely.
Here g is an asymptotic inverse of f (and it is determined uniquely to within asymptotic equivalence).
Similar(31)
Thus, this guarantees that (y_{s}) can be determined uniquely.
Hence, by virtue of the condition τ ( 1 ) = φ 3 ( 0 ), w 1 ( 0 ) are determined uniquely, since, using relations (47), (44), (45), and (51), ν ( x ) are determined uniquely.
This result also shows that complex conductivities can be determined uniquely from the DN map.
The functions a+ and a- in (14) are determined uniquely up to a constant factor.
The system is homogeneous; therefore, the coefficients cannot be determined uniquely.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com