is designs to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is designs to" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "is designed to"? You can use "is designed to" when describing the purpose or function of something, indicating that it was created with a specific intention in mind. Example: "The new software is designed to improve user experience and streamline workflow."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"It is designed to be very educational.

The New York Times - Sports

The remainder is designed to stop vehicles.

Independent

The gonad is designed to mate us,.

The New Yorker

It is designed to work with Facebook.

The New York Times

Il Palio is designed to impress.

The New York Times

"Corrective training" is designed to do that.

The New York Times

The Leash ($40) is designed to help.

The New York Times

"It is designed to break your heart".

The New York Times - Books

BitTorrent is designed to remedy this.

The Economist

"It is designed to defeat them.

The New York Times

But Xerus is designed to make money.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the past participle "designed" instead of the present tense "designs" when indicating that something was created with a specific intention. The correct phrase is "is designed to".

Common error

Avoid using "designs" when you mean "designed". "Designs" is the present tense of the verb 'to design' or a noun, while "designed" is the past participle, which is required in the passive construction "is designed to".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is designs to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "is designed to", where "designed" functions as a past participle in a passive voice construction, indicating the purpose or intent behind the design. Ludwig AI flags this error.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is designs to" is grammatically incorrect and should be corrected to "is designed to". As pointed out by Ludwig AI, the correct phrase uses the past participle "designed" to indicate that something has been created with a specific purpose. The corrected phrase is versatile and can be used across various contexts to explain the intended function of an object, system, or process. Common alternatives include "is intended to" and "is meant to", offering similar ways to express purpose and intention.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is designed to

Corrects the grammar from 'designs' to 'designed', indicating a passive voice construction.

is intended to

Replaces 'designed' with 'intended', providing a similar meaning with a focus on purpose.

is meant to

Substitutes 'designed' with 'meant', conveying the intended function or purpose.

is created to

Uses 'created' instead of 'designed', highlighting the act of creation for a specific purpose.

is built to

Replaces 'designed' with 'built', emphasizing the construction or assembly for a particular function.

is purposed to

Uses 'purposed' instead of 'designed', focusing on the intended purpose or aim.

is set up to

Substitutes 'designed' with 'set up', highlighting the arrangement or configuration for a specific task.

serves to

Replaces the entire phrase with 'serves to', indicating the function or role something performs.

functions as

Uses 'functions as' to describe the role or operation of something, rather than its design.

aims to

Replaces the passive construction with 'aims to', directly stating the goal or objective.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "is designs to"?

The correct phrase is "is designed to". The word "designed" is the past participle of the verb 'to design' and is used in this passive construction to indicate purpose or intention.

What does "is designed to" mean?

The phrase "is designed to" means that something has been created or planned with a specific purpose or function in mind. It indicates the intended use or goal of a particular object, system, or process.

Can I use "is designs for" instead of "is designed to"?

No, "is designs for" is not grammatically correct. The correct and commonly used phrase is "is designed to". If you want to use "for", you could rephrase the sentence to something like "it is a design for...".

What are some alternatives to "is designed to"?

Some alternatives to "is designed to" include "is intended to", "is meant to", or "is created to", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.