is described to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is described to" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not commonly used and may lead to confusion regarding its intended meaning. Example: "The process is described to the participants during the training session."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Kaleidoscopic" is how it is described to me.

The Guardian - Arts

An apparatus is described to make this measurement.

Chemical Engineering Science

An electronic commerce system is described to illustrate the approach.

Science of Computer Programming

The production of timber is described to explain the different methods for conversion seasoning, and grading.

Civil Engineering Materials

In the branch-and-bound method an effective pruning technique is described to reduce the runtime.

Microprocessors and Microsystems

Finally, a representative scenario is described to display the operation of the system.

The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications

A methodology is described to determine the carbon budget of an extended region with mixed vegetation.

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

A Bayesian procedure is described to analyze the data and draw inferences in SCDs.

Journal of School Psychology

A new technique is described to calibrate the flame delivery flux of an aerosol-producing nebulizer.

Combustion and Flame

A simple method is described to synthesize mesoporous SBA-15 with controlled distinct morphologies.

Catalysis Today

A Bayesian change point model is described to detect changes in temporal rates.

Structural Safety

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "is described to" in formal writing; it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Opt for alternatives like "is described as".

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "to" instead of "as" after "described". Remember that "described" typically takes "as" to correctly indicate a description.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is described to" functions as part of a passive construction, aiming to indicate that something is being characterized or explained. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this particular phrasing is not considered grammatically correct in standard English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

71%

News & Media

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "is described to" appears frequently across various sources, Ludwig AI advises that it is not grammatically correct in standard English. The phrase aims to convey how something is being characterized or explained, but better alternatives such as ""is described as"", "is defined as", or "is explained as" offer clearer and more grammatically sound options. Despite its common occurrence in certain contexts like science and news media, it's best to avoid "is described to" in formal writing to ensure clarity and correctness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is described as

Changes the preposition to "as", which is grammatically correct and commonly used to indicate a description.

is defined as

Replaces "described" with "defined", suitable when providing a formal or precise explanation.

is characterized by

Emphasizes the distinctive features or qualities of something.

is explained as

Suggests a more detailed or interpretive description is provided.

is portrayed as

Suitable when discussing how something is represented or depicted.

is presented as

Focuses on the manner in which information is conveyed or offered.

can be described as

Adds a degree of possibility or subjectivity to the description.

is known as

Highlights the common or recognized name or description of something.

is regarded as

Implies a particular opinion or viewpoint influences the description.

is understood as

Focuses on the interpretation or comprehension of the description.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "described" in a sentence?

The correct phrasing is usually "is described as", for example, "The artwork "is described as" abstract".

What can I say instead of "is described to"?

Consider using phrases like "is defined as", "is characterized by", or "is explained as" for clearer communication.

Which is correct, "is described to" or "is described as"?

"Is described as" is the grammatically correct option. "Is described to" is generally considered incorrect in standard English.

Why is "is described to" considered incorrect?

The preposition "to" doesn't logically connect with the act of describing something. The phrase ""is described as"" correctly indicates the nature or quality of the description.