Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Assuming the endocrine disruptor hypothesis is correct, study of altered gene expression in affected postpubertal male SBTD might be rewarding.
Similar(59)
Even when the summary is correct, studies show that the media incorrectly reports the research findings or doesn't place them in the historical context of other key research on the subject.
If the SSM is correct, studies of patients' families can be expected to underestimate the true fertility associated with schizotypy.
Even if estimates of the effect of NAT2 from published data are correct, studies with around 3000 5000 cases will be needed to confirm them.
If the narrow view is correct, the study points out, medicating the symptoms of a disorder is uncontroversial.
In order to determine which scenario is correct a study utilizing multiple complement blocking strategies will be necessary.
If this hypothesis is correct, our study may help to understand how rapid evolving genes involved in the determination of a key reproductive trait in early development affect species divergence.
If our model is correct, these studies suggest that the balance between GE and GI neuronal activity is altered by recurrent hypoglycemia.
If the hypothesis is correct, then studies of repetitive families can be of fundamental importance for understanding the relationship between population structure and speciation.
If Shermer is correct, then these studies would not have made it through even the gentlest peer review.
Alternatively, if it is correct for such studies to not always require informed consent, this calls the abusive conduct-prevention rationale into question.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com