Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Leslie Savan ("In Defense of Martha," Op-Ed, June 27) is correct in recognizing that the pillorying of Martha Stewart mirrors that of Hillary Rodham Clinton, but she doesn't expand on the significance of that congruity.
Nadia Naviwala ("Let Pakistan make its own progress," Views, March 16) is correct in recognizing that social change, economic growth and political maturity led by Pakistanis themselves will lead to a more secure and prosperous Pakistan.
Although Interior Secretary Donald P. Hodel is correct in recognizing the needs of those who enjoy viewing the Grand Canyon from the sky, he ignores the fact that daily overflights completely usurp the rights of those who wish to experience only natural sounds and sights in this wondrous setting.
Similar(57)
The New Dealers were correct in recognizing that the U.S. was experiencing deflation.
Battey was correct in recognizing that Burbank has always had a loyal core of residents who are committed to making their city the best it can be by being devoted to almost every civic or charitable organization.
Mr. McGerr is correct in his emphasis on how the progressives recognized that as members of the middle class they were caught between capital and labor and could not escape unharmed from accelerating class warfare.
The Justice Department, the defense lawyers wrote, is "correct in conceding that these offenses were not and still are not recognized under the international laws of war.
They were correct in 367.
Both are correct in their own ways.
You're correct in your assessment".
Although all human genetic association studies discussed here have been individually determined to be positively associated with a disease or phenotype in a peer reviewed journal, we make no assertion that any individual study is correct and we recognize the controversy in the genetics community regarding statistical and biological significance of genetic association studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com