Sentence examples for is considered interfering from inspiring English sources

In addition, two tiers of surrounding macrocells are considered as interference for each macrocell, and the worst-case scenario is considered: interfering BSs transmit at their maximum allocated power.

Pressed for details about Trumka's assertion that murder doesn't count as a violation of labor rules, Thea Lee, the AFL-CIO deputy chief of staff, told HuffPost that USTR officials said in at least two meetings where she was present that killing and brutalizing organizers would not be considered interfering with labor rights under the terms of the trade measures.

Randomization was not feasible as it was considered interfering too much with internal school affairs and was considered un-ethical by the implementing as well as funding organizations.

For these patients alternative approaches may be considered, interfering with, for example, APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand) and B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS).

However, in conservation areas, fire suppression is promoted to avoid wildfires; whereas domestic livestock grazing is considered a strong interfering factor for tree establishment, due to trampling and browsing.

Stochastic noise can be beneficial, e.g. for survival in fluctuating stressful environment [ 54, 55], but in general it is considered to decrease fitness or interfere with development [ 53, 56].

The actual interference from the other user is the projection to the phase offset of user 1 at the point C or D. In order to simplify the calculation in (18) and (19), interference symbol from the interfering user is considered as a continuous random variable and the message is approximated into a real Gaussian random variable with a phase offset.

This right is considered absolute, and anything that would interfere with the property without consent – often even taxation – is considered an infringement.

As many factors interact and interfere with adherence, it is considered as a multidimensional phenomenon [ 15].

A given species was considered to interfere if it resulted in a ±5 % variation of the absorbance signal.

An ion was considered to interfere when its presence produced a variation in the thermal lens signal of the sample of more than 5%.