is comprehensive with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is comprehensive with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is not commonly used and may lead to confusion; a more appropriate phrase would be "is comprehensive of" or "is comprehensive in." Example: "The report is comprehensive of all the necessary data and analysis required for the project."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

The Third International Dictionary, Unabridged version is comprehensive, with 257,000 definitions.

The New York Times - Tech

The model is comprehensive with all necessary physics and includes the presence of discrete energy levels in these nanocrystals and also the effect of shift in energy levels in the nanocrystals with more than one electron.

Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

In the end his defeat was comprehensive, with Oswald taking 23,013 votes to Murphy's 19,250.

The Guardian

"New York's Money Funnels," your Aug. 13 editorial regarding a loophole in the state's campaign finance laws that allows corporations to surpass contribution limits to candidates by forming subsidiaries, was comprehensive, with one exception.

The New York Times

Because it is impossible to be comprehensive with the limited space available in this venue, I will simply point to two examples to support my contention.

Huffington Post

In our study, the symptoms in inquiry diagnosis are comprehensive, with a total of 125 symptoms.

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

This measure was considered to be comprehensive, with relevant content (i.e. wheelchair inclusive) and applicable items.

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

The hospital records were comprehensive with extensive anamnestic information provided by parents, teachers and local health workers.

BMC Psychiatry

Although this review was designed to be comprehensive with a robust search strategy, it is possible that that not all studies were identified.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

First, not all genomes of holocentric and monocentric insects are annotated well enough for us to be comprehensive with our searches.

eLife

We do so in the spirit of being comprehensive, with the full understanding that neutrality of function cannot be assumed in these cases.

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for clarity and correctness, replace "is comprehensive with" with alternatives like "is comprehensive in scope" or "is thorough in its analysis". This ensures your writing adheres to standard English grammar.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "comprehensive". The correct preposition to use is usually "in" or "of", depending on the context. For example, "The report is comprehensive in its assessment" or "The review is comprehensive of all relevant studies".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is comprehensive with" functions as a descriptive phrase, aiming to convey that something is thorough or all-inclusive. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this phrasing is grammatically incorrect. The intended function is often better served by using "is comprehensive in" or "is comprehensive of".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "is comprehensive with" attempts to describe something as thorough and inclusive, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. According to Ludwig AI, standard English favors alternatives like "is comprehensive in" or "is comprehensive of". Although it appears in both scientific and news-related contexts, its rarity and grammatical issues suggest avoiding this phrase in favor of clearer, more accepted alternatives. Always aim for precision and correctness in your writing by opting for established grammatical structures.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is comprehensive in scope

Focuses on the breadth and extent of coverage, emphasizing the range of the subject matter.

is thorough with

Highlights the detailed and exhaustive nature of the treatment or examination.

is exhaustive in its coverage

Emphasizes the completeness and lack of omissions in the material presented.

is all-inclusive with

Indicates that everything is included, without any exceptions or exclusions.

is inclusive of

Highlights the inclusion of a particular set of elements or considerations.

is detailed and complete

Focuses on the depth and overall coverage, highlighting both aspects.

is extensive in detail

Emphasizes the significant amount of detail included.

is broad in scope

Highlights the wide range of topics or areas covered.

is complete with

Focuses on the state of being finished or having all necessary parts.

is wide-ranging in its approach

Highlights the diversity and variety of methods or perspectives used.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "comprehensive" in a sentence?

The adjective "comprehensive" is often followed by prepositions like "in" or "of". For example, you could say, "The study is comprehensive in its analysis" or "The database is comprehensive of all known species".

What can I say instead of "is comprehensive with"?

You can use alternatives like "is comprehensive in", "is comprehensive of", or "is thorough with", depending on the context.

Which is correct, "is comprehensive with" or "is comprehensive in"?

"Is comprehensive in" is generally considered more grammatically correct than "is comprehensive with". The preposition "in" is often used to describe the scope or area in which something is comprehensive.

What's the difference between "is comprehensive of" and "is comprehensive in"?

"Is comprehensive of" implies inclusion or coverage of specific items or elements. "Is comprehensive in" implies a thoroughness or depth within a particular area or field.