is components of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is components of" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "are components of"? You can use the corrected phrase when describing elements that make up a larger whole. Example: "The main ingredients in this recipe are components of a balanced diet."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

6 human-written examples

Another useful way to classify nonlinear problems is according to the number of variables (that is, components of x).

Encyclopedia Britannica

That is, components of (phi_{0}) not in s are zero.

Journal of Inequalities and Applications

Several of the rivalry experiments we have discussed exhibit interocular grouping, that is, components of the left eye and right eye images are combined to achieve a single coherent percept [24, 25].

The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience (JMN)

(I eliminate isolated reactions, that is, components of size one from this graph).

BMC Evolutionary Biology

The second source of inner filter effects is components of the culture that are non-fluorescent and interfere with the excitation and/or emission light.

Biotechnology for Biofuels

The Euclidean distance is defined by: where x j is the j th component of the source vector, and c ij is the j th is components of the code-vector c i. S n is the nearest-neighbor region associated with code-vector c n, and the partitions of the whole region are denoted by P={ S 1,S 2,…,S N}.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

AP3B2 is component of neuron specific AP3 complex.

Clinical Proteomics

All these are components of nonfiction writing.

The New Yorker

They were "components of a business," he said.

The New York Times

They are all phospholipids, which are components of cell membranes.

The Economist

In fact, Krugman has been conflating two distinct ideas as if both were components of "progressive" thinking.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the plural form of the verb "are" when referring to multiple components. The correct phrase is "are components of".

Common error

Avoid using the singular verb "is" with the plural noun "components". This creates a subject-verb disagreement. Always use "are" when referring to multiple components or elements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is components of" functions as an attempt to identify the constituent elements of something. However, it is grammatically flawed, using a singular verb with a plural noun. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is not correct in English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is components of" is grammatically incorrect due to a subject-verb disagreement. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is not correct. The correct phrase is "are components of". While the intended meaning—to describe the parts that make up a whole—is usually clear, using the correct grammar is essential for clear and effective communication. Consider using alternatives like "are elements of" or "constitute" for better accuracy. Be aware of the importance of subject-verb agreement to avoid this error. The sources where this phrase appears are varied, but the grammatical error undermines their authority.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are components of

Corrects the grammatical error by using the plural form "are" to agree with the plural noun "components".

are constituents of

Substitutes "components" with "constituents", offering another formal synonym.

are elements of

Replaces "components" with "elements", providing a synonymous term for parts or constituents.

are parts of

Uses the simpler term "parts" instead of "components", maintaining the same meaning.

are integral parts of

Adds the adjective "integral" to emphasize the essential nature of the components.

constitute

Employs a verb, "constitute", to express the idea of forming or composing something.

comprise

Uses the verb "comprise" to indicate that something is made up of certain parts.

form part of

Uses a verb phrase to indicate that something contributes to the whole.

are building blocks of

Replaces "components" with a more figurative term, "building blocks", to emphasize the foundational nature of the parts.

are included in

Indicates that something exists as a constituent element inside something else.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "is components of"?

The correct phrase is "are components of". The verb must agree with the plural noun "components".

What can I say instead of "is components of"?

Instead of the incorrect phrase "is components of", you can use "are elements of", "are parts of", or "constitute".

Which is correct, "is components of" or "are components of"?

Are components of is the correct phrase. "Is components of" is grammatically incorrect due to subject-verb disagreement.

What's the difference between "is component of" and "are components of"?

"Is component of" refers to a single element, while "are components of" refers to multiple elements that make up a whole.