It is unclear whether such a claim is cognizable in Arkansas.
We therefore hold that a claim of unconstitutional search and seizure is cognizable in a § 2255 proceeding.
A variant is the so-called "saṃvedana- inference": "the object is not different from the cognizing consciousness, because it is being cognized (saṃvedyamāna); only what is essentially identical (tādātmya) with consciousness is cognizable".
(Tsongkhapa 1984b:176)[4] This means that the two truths relate to "two objects of knowledge," the idea it takes from the statement of the Buddha from Discourse on Meeting of the Father and the Son (Pitāputrasamāgama Sūtra)[5] By object of knowledge Gelug means an object that is cognizable (blo'i yul du bya rung ba).
Under the holding in Hagans, supra, 415 U.S., at 536, 94 S.Ct., at 1378, that a federal court has power to hear a pendent claim based on the Social Security Act when a substantial constitutional claim is also raised, 33 a cause of action for the pendent statutory claim must still be 'authorized by law' in order for the claim to be cognizable in federal court under § 1343.
Singer: John, in your even newer article titled Antitrust in Digital Markets—seriously, you need to slow down, making the rest of us look bad you argue that digital markets are conducive to "exotic anticompetitive strategies" that are cognizable under existing antitrust law but unlikely to attract scrutiny from regulators.
About the only way to proceed is to work from the bottom up, ascertaining fist which issues are cognizable on habeas, and which are not, and thereafter inferring what must be thought to be the nature of the writ.
Our FELA jurisprudence outlines the analysiswe must undertake when deciding whether, and to what extent, this new category of claims should be cognizable under the statute.
The authority of any federal agency to sue and be sued in its own name shall not be construed to authorize suits against such federal agency on claims which are cognizable under section 1346(b) of this title, and the remedies provided by this title in such cases shall be exclusive.
Under the 25percentt attribution benchmark, X's interest in "carrier"' would be cognizable, while A's interest would not be cognizable.
1207, 1227, 25 L.Ed.2d 442, that the plaintiff's claims should not be cognizable in a federal court.
