is cited with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is cited with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to indicate that a source is referenced or mentioned in a particular context. Example: "The study is cited with several other important research papers in the literature review."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

So is Singleton, though at other times he is cited with a punctilious courtesy.

The New Yorker

Coulson's supposed motto, "Get the story, no matter what", is cited with a curled lip.

The Guardian

For Rush and Breitbart, the "Obamaphone" (and the accompanying opportunity to link or play the clip) is cited with an attitude of gleeful gross-out humor, like a fifth-grader making fart noises – though with an undercurrent of racism far nastier and more base than any bodily function.

The Guardian - Opinion

The first [48] is cited with the largest number of times, even up to 72, focusing on the "open innovation" of the business model just as the above analysis in the core dataset.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

A single poetic 'Epistle' to her husband, written during his imprisonment by the French in 1512, is all that survives of Colonna's poetry from this early period, but she is cited with enough frequency by contemporary Neapolitan writers to suggest that her work was already enjoying some significant scribal publication in and around Naples, if not further afield.

University of Chicago

The Vanderberg et al. study (Int. J. Parasitol., 2004) is cited with other reports of sporozoite motility being important for dermal exit.

eLife

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

The company was cited with 221 violations.

The New York Times

The Coyne case has been cited with approval many times.

Cornell University

This month, Al Taqwa was cited with Al Barakaat by the United States in an order blocking their assets.

The New York Times

The Coast Guard said in a news release that the three had been cited with security violations.

The New York Times

Good or excellent results in 91% of patients are cited with a revision rate for aseptic loosening of 1%.

The Journal of Arthroplasty

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "is cited with" in formal writing. Instead, opt for more precise and grammatically correct alternatives such as "is cited in conjunction with" or "is referenced alongside" to ensure clarity and accuracy.

Common error

A frequent error is using "is cited with" when the intention is to convey that a source is referenced in support of a particular point. To avoid this, replace it with phrases like "is referenced in" or "is mentioned alongside" which are grammatically sound and clearly indicate the relationship between the cited material and the current discussion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is cited with" functions as a passive construction attempting to link a subject with a reference or association. However, Ludwig AI suggests that it's not grammatically sound and more accurate phrases should be used.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Academia

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "is cited with" appears in a variety of sources, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically incorrect. Its intended meaning is to show a connection between a subject and a reference. For clarity and grammatical accuracy, it's best to use alternatives such as "is referenced in", "is mentioned alongside", or "is cited in conjunction with". These alternatives ensure that your writing remains precise and professional across various contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is referenced alongside

Uses "referenced" instead of "cited" and "alongside" to indicate a parallel mention.

is identified alongside

Similar to "referenced alongside" but emphasizes the act of identification.

is mentioned in conjunction with

Replaces "cited" with "mentioned" and adds "in conjunction with" to emphasize the association.

is noted together with

Replaces "cited" with "noted" and uses "together with" to show simultaneous acknowledgement.

is named along with

Uses "named" instead of "cited" to highlight the act of being identified together.

is discussed in relation to

Highlights the context of discussion and relevance.

is associated with

Focuses on the connection rather than the act of citing.

is linked to

Emphasizes a direct connection or relationship.

is considered with

Focuses on simultaneous consideration or evaluation.

is presented with

Focuses on simultaneous presentation or inclusion.

FAQs

What does "is cited with" mean?

The phrase "is cited with" is often used to indicate that something is referenced or mentioned alongside something else. However, it's not considered grammatically correct. It's better to use phrases like "is referenced in" or "is mentioned alongside".

How can I use "is cited with" correctly?

While the phrase "is cited with" isn't technically correct, the intention is usually to express that something is being referred to in connection with something else. It's advisable to use alternatives such as "is cited in conjunction with" or "is mentioned in relation to" for better clarity.

What are some alternatives to "is cited with"?

Better alternatives to "is cited with" include "is referenced in", "is mentioned alongside", or "is associated with". These options provide clarity and are grammatically correct.

Is it better to use "is cited with" or "is cited in"?

It is better to use "is cited in" instead of "is cited with". The phrase "is cited in" is grammatically correct and clearly indicates that a source is being referenced within a particular context. "Is cited with" is generally considered incorrect.