Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is categorised to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "is categorised to" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression would typically be "is categorised as" or "is categorised under." Example: "The species is categorised as endangered due to habitat loss."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
is classified as
is grouped into
is assigned to
is categorised as
is labeled as
is identified as
is sorted into
is placed in
is divided into
is considered to be
is known as
is designated to
is apportioned to
is considered to
is classified to
is disaggregated to
is characterized to
is characterised to
is described to
is disbursed to
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
Because the delay in the initiation of NAB treatment (relative to the start of colonisation) may vary between patients, it is important to correct for time-varying bias, which occurs when the exposure variable is categorised to its final status rather than considering the timing of the change in status [ 13, 14].
Science
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
In this categorisation, one standard may be categorised to several different technologies.
Three patients were categorised to have no morphologic response.
Science
In Finland, the index vignette and vignette 1 are categorised to different DRGs.
Science
Questions were categorised to elicit patients' demographic characteristics, knowledge, perception and practice of various lifestyle-modification measures.
Age and schistosome infection intensity was categorised to satisfy the assumptions of parametric tests (see [37]).
Science
Sixty-three questions were patient-specific while 37 were categorised to be more general.
To date, PTX preparations that are categorised to DDSs have been developed.
Science
Per-capita monthly expenditure was categorised to quintiles: q1 (lowest) to q5 (highest).
Science
Where appropriate, themes were categorised to facilitate higher-level interpretation of the data.
Science
11 Continuous variables were categorised to aid in a clinical application.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using "is categorised to". Instead, use "is categorised as" or other alternatives like "is classified as" or "is grouped into" for clearer and more grammatically sound writing.
Common error
The incorrect use of the preposition "to" after "categorised" leads to a grammatically flawed sentence. Always use "as", "under", or "into" depending on the intended meaning.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is categorised to" functions as a passive verb construction attempting to describe the act of placing something into a category. However, according to Ludwig AI, this particular phrasing is grammatically incorrect, which limits its effectiveness in formal communication.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, while the phrase "is categorised to" might appear in some contexts, particularly within scientific literature, it is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as non-standard English. Prefer using alternatives like "is categorised as", "is classified as", or "is grouped into" for clearer and more accurate communication. These alternatives ensure grammatical correctness and maintain the intended meaning of assigning something to a specific category. Always prioritize precise language in your writing to avoid potential misunderstandings.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is classified as
This alternative uses a more direct and standard verb for classification.
is grouped into
This suggests a broader categorization into a group or set.
is assigned to
This alternative implies a specific assignment to a category.
is labeled as
This suggests that a label is being applied to something to categorize it.
is identified as
This implies recognizing and placing something within a category.
is sorted into
Indicates the act of sorting items into predefined categories.
is placed in
Implies a straightforward placement within a specific category.
is divided into
Suggests partitioning items into distinct categories.
is considered to be
Frames the categorization as an opinion or assessment.
is known as
This alternative suggests widespread or established categorization.
FAQs
What are the correct prepositions to use after "categorised"?
The correct prepositions to use after "categorised" are "as", "under", or "into", depending on the context. Using "to" is grammatically incorrect.
How can I avoid using "is categorised to" in my writing?
Instead of "is categorised to", use alternatives such as "is classified as", "is grouped into", or "is assigned to". Choose the option that best fits the context of your sentence.
Which is correct: "is categorised to" or "is categorised as"?
"Is categorised as" is the correct and grammatically sound phrase. "Is categorised to" is not standard English.
What's the difference between "is categorised as" and "is classified as"?
While both phrases are grammatically correct and have similar meanings, "is categorised as" generally implies a broader, more subjective assessment, while ""is classified as"" often suggests a more formal or scientific system of categorization.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested