is budget for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is budget for" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be an incomplete expression and lacks proper context or structure. Example: "The budget for the project is due next week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

"What these executives do is budget for an increase in employment, and their answers reflect the budgeted funds," he said.

The New York Times

VICE put together our own (entirely subjective on what our idea of 'fun' is) budget for a 20-something archetype who, despite partying a lot and being lazy with the Ubers and Foodora, sees themselves buying a condo and paying off their student loans completely in five years.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Now it is budgeting for five.

The New York Times

"It is budgeted for, it is accounted for," he said.

The Guardian - Sport

A further £2 million is budgeted for the year ahead.

Independent

Only $10 million is budgeted for the period after late March 2012.

The New York Times

She was paid $4,000 $5,0000 is budgeted for next summer).

The New York Times

Moreover, no additional money is budgeted for new initiatives.

The New York Times

Around £10m is budgeted for serious factual programmes and £10m on comedy.

The Guardian

The military budget rose by more than 10% last year and is budgeted for a rise of 17% this year (see article).

The Economist

Another $9.4 million is budgeted for 2013, but many teachers in the countryside say the aid does not reach them.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the correct passive form "is budgeted for" when indicating that funds have been officially allocated for a specific purpose.

Common error

Do not use the phrase "is budget for". Instead, use "is budgeted for" or other alternatives like "is allocated for" to maintain grammatical correctness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is budget for" is an incorrect grammatical construction. It attempts to describe a state where something is in the process of being a budget, but it lacks the necessary past participle. Ludwig AI marks this as incorrect, suggesting it needs grammatical correction. The phrase needs to be corrected to "is budgeted for".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "is budget for" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its incorrectness and suggests using the correct form, "is budgeted for", or other alternatives like "is allocated for". Although examples exist in "News & Media" and "Science", its rarity and grammatical issues make it unsuitable for formal use. Always opt for the passive voice construction "is budgeted for" to accurately convey that funds have been allocated.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is budgeted for

This is the grammatically correct passive voice form, indicating that funds have been allocated.

budgeted for

This is the past participle form of the verb, often used in passive constructions or as an adjective.

is allocated for

This uses "allocated" instead of "budgeted", providing a synonym with a similar meaning.

funds are designated for

This alternative emphasizes the designation of funds for a specific purpose.

money is set aside for

This phrase implies a reservation of funds for a particular use.

resources are allocated to

This emphasizes the broader allocation of resources, not just monetary funds.

provisions are made for

This alternative suggests that arrangements or preparations have been made regarding the budget.

spending is planned for

This focuses on the planning aspect of how money will be spent.

a budget exists for

This phrase indicates the presence of a budget dedicated to something.

financing is in place for

This implies that the financial backing or funding is secured for a project or purpose.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say money is allocated for something?

The grammatically correct way to express that money is allocated for something is to say "is budgeted for" or "is allocated for".

What can I say instead of "is budget for"?

Instead of "is budget for", you can use alternatives such as "is budgeted for", "is allocated for", or "funds are designated for" depending on the context.

Is "is budget for" grammatically correct?

No, "is budget for" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrase is "is budgeted for", which uses the passive voice.

What's the difference between "is budget for" and "is budgeted for"?

"Is budget for" is grammatically incorrect. "Is budgeted for" is the correct passive voice construction to indicate that funds have been allocated.