Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
is be of
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "is be of" is not correct and not usable in written English.
It appears to be a combination of verbs that does not form a coherent expression. Example: "The concept is be of great importance" should be corrected to "The concept is of great importance."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
"What we'd like to do," Ms. Kris continued, "is be of assistance to the city in trying to create waterfront access that is attractive, available to a broader population in the community, and which complies with the law".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
I am being of service.
News & Media
whatever it is, be proud of it!
Wiki
Mecca is being cleansed of Meccans".
News & Media
She is being ironic, of course.
News & Media
That's been part of my problem.
News & Media
"It's been years of doing nothing.
News & Media
She's being modest of course.
News & Media
"Where they are is kind of irrelevant.
News & Media
It's been one of those years.
News & Media
There's been nothing of the sort.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "is be of" in your writing. It is grammatically incorrect. Instead, use phrases like "is a part of", "is for", or other alternatives that correctly convey your intended meaning.
Common error
A common mistake is to use "is be of" when trying to express that something belongs or contributes to something else. This error arises from incorrect verb conjugation. Always ensure that the verb 'to be' is correctly conjugated and followed by appropriate prepositions or articles.
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "is be of" is an incorrect combination of verbs. The correct form depends on the intended meaning, but it generally involves using a proper verb followed by a preposition. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided.
Frequent in
News & Media
100%
Less common in
Science
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "is be of" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in all forms of writing. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase represents an error in verb conjugation. To express similar ideas, consider alternatives such as "is a part of", "is for", or "serves as", which are grammatically correct and effectively communicate the intended meaning. Despite appearing in some news and media sources, its incorrectness makes it unsuitable for formal, professional, or even neutral contexts.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
is a part of
Replaces the incorrect "is be of" with a grammatically correct expression indicating inclusion or membership.
is an element of
This alternative replaces the incorrect phrase with a more formal way of describing a component.
is for
Replaces the initial phrase with a direct statement of purpose or intended recipient.
serves as
Offers a substitute that focuses on the function or role something provides.
is intended to
Aims to correct the initial phrase by clarifying the goal or aim.
is designed for
Replaces with a phrase that emphasizes purpose through design.
is meant for
Provides an alternative that communicates intent or destination.
contributes to
Offers an alternative expressing how something aids or adds to a larger result.
is useful for
This expression is used as an alternative to emphasize utility or benefit of something.
assists in
Provides a substitute that focuses on the supportive nature of something.
FAQs
Why is the phrase "is be of" considered grammatically incorrect?
The construction "is be of" combines the verb "is" with the infinitive "be", which is grammatically redundant and incorrect in standard English. It's generally an error in verb conjugation.
What can I say instead of "is be of" to indicate belonging or inclusion?
Instead of "is be of", you can use phrases like "is a part of", "is an element of", or "is for" depending on the specific context.
How can I avoid making mistakes with verb conjugations similar to "is be of"?
To avoid such mistakes, carefully review your sentence structure and verb conjugations. Ensure that each verb agrees with its subject and that you are not combining redundant forms of the verb 'to be'.
Is there any context where "is be of" might be acceptable?
No, the phrase "is be of" is not considered acceptable in any standard context. It is always recommended to use grammatically correct alternatives.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
80%
Authority and reliability
1.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested