is backed to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "is backed to" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey support or reinforcement but lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "The project is backed to ensure its success" would be better phrased as "The project is backed by funding to ensure its success."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

In contrast with the Senate, the House, whose membership is backed to a greater extent by the Tea Party, was deeply divided.

The Guardian

The company is backed to the tune of $230k and is currently fundraising.

TechCrunch

The company was founded in 2010 and is backed to the tune of £1.6 million (approx. $2.6m).

TechCrunch

Meanwhile, ThePresent.co is backed to the tune of £1.5m from various London-based investors, including a Goldman Sachs syndicate.

TechCrunch

Meanwhile, I've learned that Bezahlt is backed to the tune of €3.5 million with a mixture of equity and debt.

TechCrunch

eRepublik Labs was founded in 2007 and is backed to the tune of €2,750,000 from AGF Private Equity in addition to various angels.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

Nothing is back to normal".

Independent

And he is back to chanting.

The New York Times

And Mr. Sanocki is back to work.

The New York Times

I think he is back to normal.

The New York Times

Now, it is back to white.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider replacing "is backed to" with more precise language like "is funded by", "is supported by", or "is endorsed by" to enhance clarity.

Common error

Don't use "is backed to" without specifying the type of backing (e.g., financial, moral, political). Vague language weakens your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is backed to" functions as a passive construction, attempting to describe a state of being supported or funded. However, as Ludwig AI indicates, this phrasing is non-standard and grammatically questionable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Formal & Business

30%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "is backed to" appears in some contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect and non-standard in English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. It's best to replace it with clearer and more accurate alternatives such as "is supported by", "is funded by", or "is endorsed by", depending on the specific type of support you wish to convey. Using precise language will improve the clarity and professionalism of your writing. Though frequent, its incorrectness should discourage its use.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is supported by

Focuses on general support rather than specific financial backing.

is funded by

Specifically highlights financial support or investment.

is endorsed by

Emphasizes public approval or recommendation.

receives backing from

Rephrases to emphasize the act of receiving support.

is sponsored by

Suggests a formal agreement of support, often financial.

is underwritten by

Implies financial guarantee or risk assumption.

is financed by

Similar to funded, but can include debt financing.

has the support of

Highlights the presence of backing without specifying the type.

is championed by

Suggests active promotion and advocacy.

is guaranteed by

Emphasizes assurance and security provided by the backing.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "is backed to"?

You can use alternatives like "is supported by", "is funded by", or "is endorsed by" depending on the context.

How can I use "is backed to" in a sentence correctly?

While not standard, if you intend to use it, ensure you clarify what kind of backing is provided. However, it is better to avoid it completely.

Is "is backed to" grammatically correct?

According to Ludwig AI, the phrase "is backed to" is not correct in standard written English. It is better to use alternative phrases that are more precise and grammatically sound.

What's the difference between "is backed by" and "is backed to"?

"Is backed by" is grammatically correct and means supported or funded. "Is backed to" is not standard English; replace it with a more appropriate phrase depending on the intended meaning.