is ascribed to

USAGE SUMMARY

"is ascribed to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the attribution of a quotation or idea to a particular author or source. For example, "The famous quote, 'All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream,' is ascribed to Edgar Allan Poe."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

So much importance is ascribed to that role.

The Guardian

The covenant, defining Israel's obligations, is ascribed to Moses' mediation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

This is ascribed to an embryonic nuclei-induced alloying process.

Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids

Strategic alignment is ascribed to socio-ideological controls.

Scandinavian Journal of Management

The heating up of Reagan's rhetoric is ascribed to Patrick Buchanan, communications director.

The New Yorker

A weak peak at 2217 cm 1 is ascribed to acetylenic bond27.

Nature

Their agency is ascribed to certain characteristics, among which rationality is typically preeminent.

Britannica

This is ascribed to a competition between NO and O2.

Catalysis Today

This is ascribed to surface reactions after adsorption.

Polymer

This is ascribed to the polydispersity of PCL.

Polymer

This is ascribed to the intrinsic affinity of nematic TLCPs.

Polymer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "is ascribed to", ensure the attribution is supported by credible evidence or sources to maintain accuracy and avoid misrepresentation.

Common error

Avoid using "is ascribed to" when there is no clear basis for the attribution. Ensure that there is a reasonable connection between the subject and the attributed quality or action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "is ascribed to" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a quality, characteristic, or action is attributed to a specific source. It is commonly used to assign causality or origin, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

47%

Encyclopedias

12%

News & Media

12%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "is ascribed to" is a versatile construction used to attribute qualities, characteristics, or origins to a particular source. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread use, particularly in science, encyclopedias, and news media. It’s crucial to ensure attributions are supported by credible evidence to maintain accuracy. While alternatives like "is attributed to" or "is due to" exist, the choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey. Remember to avoid misattributing qualities without a clear basis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

is attributed to

Replaces "ascribed" with "attributed", focusing on the act of assigning something as a cause or characteristic.

is credited to

Emphasizes the recognition of someone's contribution or achievement.

is due to

Indicates direct causation or origin.

is a result of

Highlights the outcome or consequence of a particular action or event.

stems from

Suggests the origin or root cause of something.

is linked to

Implies a connection or association, but not necessarily direct causation.

is associated with

Similar to "linked to", suggesting a relationship or correlation.

is thought to be caused by

Presents a belief or opinion regarding the cause of something.

is considered to be from

Indicates a viewpoint about the origin of something.

is explained by

Focuses on providing a reason or justification for something.

FAQs

How can I use "is ascribed to" in a sentence?

"Is ascribed to" is used to indicate that a particular quality, characteristic, or origin is attributed to someone or something. For instance, "The invention of the printing press is ascribed to Johannes Gutenberg".

What's the difference between "is ascribed to" and "is attributed to"?

While both phrases are similar, "is ascribed to" often implies a degree of uncertainty or interpretation, whereas "is attributed to" suggests a more direct or factual connection. The choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

What are some alternatives to "is ascribed to"?

Alternatives include "is credited to", "is due to", "stems from", or "is linked to", depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "is ascribed to" in formal writing?

Yes, "is ascribed to" is suitable for formal writing, especially when discussing theories, historical events, or scientific findings where attribution is important. Ensure the context supports the level of formality.