Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Structures that are obscured by overlying organs and soft tissues that are insufficiently delineated on conventional X rays can thus be adequately visualized.
With reviewer majority analysis, 35% of the pads group's odontoid radiographs were adequately visualized versus 75% of the no pads group's open-mouth odontoid radiographs (between-group difference 40%; 95% CI 12 to 68).
Results: Zero percent of the pads group's cross-table lateral structures were adequately visualized by all 4 reviewers (reviewer unanimity decision) compared with 25% of the no pads group's cross-table lateral films (between-group difference 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0 to 44).
When 3 of 4 reviewers noted adequate visualization (reviewer majority decision), 0% of the pads group's cross-table lateral structures were adequately visualized versus 40% of the no pads group's cross-table lateral radiographs (between-group difference 40%; 95% CI 19 to 62).
Furthermore, the superior vena cava can only be adequately visualized by transesophageal echocardiography.
These complications are adequately visualized on both axial and 3D images (Fig. 5).
Recent clinical research has shown that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with small invasive carcinoma can be adequately visualized in MRI[6] and that MRI provides an accurate estimation of invasive breast cancer tumor size, especially in tumors of 2 cm or smaller[7].
Recent clinical research has shown that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with small invasive carcinoma can be adequately visualized in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI [5] and that MRI provides an accurate estimation of invasive breast cancer tumor size, especially in tumors 2 cm or smaller[6].
In these 178 women, 74% of vertebrae from T4 L4 and 82% from T8 L4 were adequately visualized on VFA.
In these 207 women, 88.4 % of vertebrae from T4 L4 and 99.0 % from T8-L4 were adequately visualized on VFA.
In these 270 women, 85.7% of vertebrae from T4 L4 and 96.2% from T8 L4 were adequately visualized on VFA.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com