Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Now suppose that \(c^*\) is a credence function in \(\mathcal{C_F}\) that violates Probabilism.
Showing who we are as a family is a credence good as a family brand.
This is a consequence of the following theorem: Theorem 5 (de Finetti) Suppose that \(c^*\) is a credence function in \(\mathcal{C_F}\) that violates Probabilism.
Similar(57)
Perhaps it thought it was a credence and not a credenza at all, one that had fallen, in the manner of an unlucky angel, to the blasphemous station of a mere sideboard.
Armstrong goes on to remind us that much of the value of higher education, particularly that of its individual institutions, is what economists generally consider to be a "credence good -- one whose utility impact is difficult to determine by the consumer in advance of consumption, and remains difficult to determine even after consumption".
Then, if \(c^*\) is a probabilistic credence function, then \(c^*\) is not weakly dominated relative to \(\mathfrak{D}\).
However, it is a higher credence in a true proposition, and thus should be assigned a lower epistemic disutility, according to the requirement of truth-directedness.
Of course, the natural response to this objection is to note that (2') only holds when \(c\) is a probabilistic credence function.
For instance, perhaps it is a virtue of a credence function if the credences it assigns cohere with one another in a particular way, and a vice if they do not.
Now, suppose \(c^\dag\) is a non-probabilistic credence function and apply the version of Joyce's argument that results from replacing (2) with (2').
Or perhaps it is a virtue of a credence in a particular proposition if it matches the degree of support given to that proposition by the agent's current total evidence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com