Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
In fact, cancer cells adhesion is a common assay to characterize their propensity to form metastases in a certain organ in vitro [ 28– 30].
Additionally, the LAL assay is a common assay for quantifying airborne endotoxin concentration from cotton dust samples, but there is no universally accepted standard protocol (Dungan and Leytem 2009).
Similar(58)
The MTT assay is a common colorimetric assay to measure the activity of enzymes that reduce MTT to formazan dyes, giving a purple color.
With the invention of the ion-selective electrode (ISE), ionic magnesium (iMg) is a common blood assay.
For example, it is a common practice to assay overall selection on the signal trait via pairing success, and to compare it among populations of the same species [14], [15], [16].
For example, since cross-drug response to different therapies is a common phenomenon in chemoresponse assays and it is thought that patients can exhibit multidrug resistance, there is concern that these factors may limit the predictive ability of an assay.
The MTT assay is a common method to evaluate the cell viability in a large number of cells [31].
The screening of a library of compounds in a biological assay is a common first step in drug discovery to find chemical hits for the drug leads.
Dilution enhancement is a common problem with the LAL assay and this effect may be compounded in a cardiac bypass patient population due to changes in plasma composition during the course of, and following, the bypass procedure due to the use of cardioplegia solutions, crystalloids and hemodilution.
This may be explained by the fact that benomyl is most likely to cause whole chromosome loss, as it functions to disrupt microtubules, and chromosome loss is a common endpoint measure in CIN assays (Stirling et al. 2011; Yuen et al. 2007).
An electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is a common affinity electrophoresis technique used to study protein-DNA interaction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com