Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Nonetheless, and despite this fact, the process of written digits (the symbolic irrelevant information) was influenced by the irrelevant quantity (in the non symbolic task).
In contrast, in the subitizing range there was a main effect of congruency [F (1, 29) =8.29, p =.007], therefore, when the irrelevant quantity was in the subitizing range congruency lessened the RDE.
Similar(58)
The identification of aerobic oropharyngeal flora in BAL fluid (BALF) cultures is commonly considered colonization, contamination from the upper respiratory tract or otherwise regarded clinically irrelevant, regardless of quantity [ 11– 13].
In the analysis of incongruent vs. congruent, where quantity (irrelevant dimension) is in the counting range in both the congruent and incongruent trials, we expected to find the same effect in both groups.
(2) The symbolic task - Where the quantity (irrelevant dimension) is in the subitizing range in both the congruent and incongruent trials, we assumed that the DD group will show a larger congruency effect (i.e., congruent vs. incongruent) compared to the control group.
Table 15 Influence of parameters on SIFT matching performance Parameter Influence on SIFT matching performance Sigman The change of Sigman value is irrelevant with the matching quantity on the whole.
Analysis 3 (congruent - subitizing vs. incongruent - subitizing): We compared condition d, congruent subitizing, to condition e, incongruent wherein the quantity (the irrelevant dimension) is in the subitizing range while the written digits (i.e., the relevant dimension) range from 1 to 9. In this comparison, there was a significant main effect [F (1, 29) = 26.158, p <.001] of congruency.
If the symbolic system of the DD group is indeed deficient [ 37, 38], as suggested above, then in the symbolic task the DD group should have been more easily influenced by the irrelevant non symbolic dimension (quantity) than the control group.
When she told a story, she felt a need to establish enormous quantities of irrelevant background information.
It requires extracting value from massive data flows, filtering out large quantities of irrelevant and useless material.
This approach reduces the burden on analysts required to review extremely large quantities of irrelevant material with consequent improvement to operational effectiveness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com