Sentence examples for ipr regulations from inspiring English sources

With regard to IPR impact specifically, I conducted a qualitative analysis of the ongoing debate on the implications of strong IPR regulations for industrial policy and economic development.

First, despite the general trend towards institutional ownership, university IPR regulations in Europe remain extremely differentiated and there is no one-to-one mapping to the US system.

Understanding the effects of changes in IPR regulations on academic patenting is a complex issue, and parallels with the US case can be misleading.

Having said this, however, it is clear that strong IPR regulations make it difficult for firms in developing countries to take risks and invest in R&D, even if public policies "encourage" them to do so.

This article develops a general framework to describe the changes in university IPR regulations in Europe and their effects on the patenting activities of universities and on knowledge transfer processes.

This paper focuses on Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002 and on the way they were affected by internal IPR regulations, set as part of broader responses to the increased level of autonomy granted to universities during the 1990s.

This result seemed to highlight an inefficiency of European research institutions to transfer scientific discoveries into something immediately useful for the economy (and the society), a consideration that grounded an institutional change of IPR regulation and of a policy push towards universities' direct engagement in patenting.

Currently, multiple agencies have jurisdiction over IPR regulation and enforcement [ 18].

Second, it is difficult to disentangle the quantitative and qualitative effects of changes in IPR ownership regulations on academic patenting activities from the effects of concurrent transformations in the institutional, cultural and organizational landscape surrounding academic knowledge transfer.

Until recently, California had no regulations governing IPR, although California utilities had known for decades that the natural filtration of surface water as it percolates downward results in improved quality of the groundwater, according to Mark LeChevallier, director of innovation and environmental stewardship at American Water, a national water and wastewater utility.

Due to the lack of informative annotations, only 12 of 57 with up-regulation and 14 of 47 with down-regulation had IPR annotation, one R gene (Ahy163031) showed higher expression in R than in S genotype through all five time points.