Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(18)
Note that T satisfies the inward condition.
Suppose that is a nonempty closed convex subset of and is a continuous pseudocontraction satisfying the weakly inward condition.
In the classical literature, it has been proved that the inward condition can be often dropped in favor of a weaker condition.
Let be a real uniformly convex Banach space, a nonempty closed subset of with as a sunny nonexpansive retraction and a mapping satisfying weakly inward condition, then.
Remark 2.7 In the case that T is a non-self mapping, we remark that Corollary 2.5 still holds under the assumption that T satisfies the weak inward condition.
T is a non-expansive mapping, which satisfies the inward condition (2) and such that (operatorname{Fix}(T neqemptyset), then ({x_{n}}) weakly converges to a point (pin operatorname{Fix}(T)).
Similar(42)
It is worth to mention that in general, the contraction and weakly inward conditions of Theorem 2.5 can not be replaced with somewhat weaker conditions, namely, nonexpansive and T ( x ) ∩ I M ( x ) ¯ ≠ 0̸, even in the setting of Banach spaces, see [5].
(b) It is worth to mention that in general, the contraction and weakly inward conditions of Theorem 2.5 can not be replaced with somewhat weaker conditions, namely, nonexpansive and T ( x ) ∩ I M ( x ) ¯ ≠ 0̸, even in the setting of Banach spaces, see [5].
A two-tailed paired-samples t test revealed that target length was larger in the target-outward/match-inward condition (M = 105.4%; SE = 1.3) than in the target-inward/match-outward condition [ M = 96.8%, SE = 1.7; t(5) = 3.0; p < .05; Fig. 3a].
This is especially true when it comes to congenital defects like entropion, with eyelashes turned inward, a condition whose correction is illegal in show dogs but necessary for the sake of the animals' well-being.
As it can be seen from Fig. 1, the radiance computed using the cDA agree relatively well with the RTE and satisfy the zero boundary condition in inward direction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com